Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Attention: Regent Laurin, Section 148
Subject: Section 85.1 of the Income Tax Act (the "Act")
XXX
We are writing in response to your memo of March 28, 1990 wherein you requested our comments on the application of section 85.1 of the Act in the following situation:
XXX
It is your view that subsection 2(3) and 115(1) of the Act indicate that a non-resident is taxable only on capital gains incurred on the disposition of TCP. You have concluded that the exchanged shares fail to meet the definition of capital property described in subparagraph 54(b)(ii) of the Act because their disposition would not result in a capital gain or loss. It is your opinion that, as the exchanged shares are not capital property, they are not subject to the provisions of section 85.1 of the Act.
Comments
Provided that the shares XXX were held as capital property by any shareholder, the gain, if any, would be a capital gain. However, a U.S. shareholder would only be subject to tax in Canada if the shares are taxable Canadian property as described in subparagraph 115(1)(b)(iii) of the Act, which we understand is not the case.
The non-resident who disposed of the XXX shares did not dispose of taxable Canadian property and there is no suggestion that they are otherwise liable to tax under the Act. On the basis of authorities such an Oceanspan Carriers and Lea-Don, the non-residents are not taxpayers for the purpose of Subsection 85.1(1) of the Act. Therefore, the cost of the shares of XXX will be determined without reference to the rule in paragraph 85.1(1)(b) of the Act.
If the shares were taxable Canadian property, a U.S. shareholder would be a taxpayer and is entitled to the treatment described in section 85.1 of the Act. As will, the U.S. shareholder would be exempt from tax in Canada by virtue of Article XIII of the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) unless the shares are described in subparagraph 3(b)(ii) thereof.
If the U.S. shareholder held the shares of XXX inventory, then the income gain might be taxable pursuant to subparagraph 115(1)(a)(ii) of the Act. However, this would only be the case if he carried on business in Canada and the profit on the shares is attributable to a permanent establishment in Canada.
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 1990
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 1990