Brulé,
T.C.J.:
—These
appeals
involve
the
appellant's
taxation
years
of
1980,
1981,
1982,
1983
and
1984.
The
issue
was
whether
or
not
the
appellant
suffered
a
non-capital
loss
in
1983
that
could
be
deductible
in
computing
his
taxable
income
for
the
1980,
1981,
1982
and
1984
taxation
years.
Facts
For
the
period
from
1971
to
1981
the
appellant
worked
for
two
companies
known
as
Carroll-Hatch
and
Associates
Ltd.
and
Carroll
Hatch
(International)
Ltd.
There
was
some
question
whether
or
not
the
appellant
was
a
full-
time
employee
of
these
companies
or,
as
he
maintained,
was
only
a
part-
time
employee
and
consultant.
In
any
event
he
was
an
important
part
of
the
organizations
in
his
various
functions
which
at
times
had
him
acting
in
the
capacity
of
director
and
signing
officer.
In
early
1981
the
appellant
was
fired
and
an
action
by
the
companies
resulted
in
a
court
order
that
he
pay
to
the
companies
the
sum
of
$141,457.13,
pre-judgment
interest
of
$72,238.70
for
a
total
of
$213,695.83
plus
transfer
percentages
of
certain
real
estate
interests
in
three
condominiums.
In
addition
to
these
amounts
the
appellant
incurred
legal
fees
of
$46,984.72.
With
the
exception
of
certain
percentages
from
the
sale
of
two
condominiums,
the
legal
fees,
and
a
$3,000
garnishee
no
amounts
were
paid
to
the
companies
pursuant
to
the
court
order
in
1983.
The
appellant
claimed
a
professional
loss
in
his
1983
income
tax
return
in
the
amount
of
$259,574.81
and
as
a
result
of
this,
requested
that
non-capital
losses
from
this
year
be
carried
back
to
prior
years
of
1980,
1981
and
1982.
In
April
of
1985
the
Minister
reassessed
the
appellant's
1983
taxation
year
dis-
allowing
certain
amounts
previously
claimed
as
a
professional
loss
with
the
result
in
that
there
was
no
loss
in
1983
and
therefore
no
carry
back
to
previous
years.
The
Minister
reassessed
the
1980,1981
and
1982
taxation
years
to
delete
previous
non-capital
loss
applications.
In
his
return
of
income
for
the
1984
taxation
year
the
appellant
claimed
a
non-capital
loss
of
other
years
in
the
amount
of
$8,923.48,
which
was
disallowed
on
initial
assessment
as
there
were
no
non-capital
losses
available
for
1984.
Appellant's
Position
The
taxpayer
based
his
appeal
on
the
fact
that
he
had
an
oral
agreement
with
Mr.
Carroll
to
be
paid
certain
amounts.
When
trouble
arose
the
appellant
was
unsuccessful
in
having
the
agreement
reduced
to
writing.
In
supervising
the
accounting
system
of
the
companies,
the
appellant
had
his
personal
account
charged
with
payments
made
to
acquire
real
estate
and
payment
of
income
taxes.
Also
the
appellant
set
up
a
fee
to
himself
for
his
work.
The
amounts
involved
were
set
up
on
an
accrual
basis
on
which
he
paid
income
taxes.
These
were
at
the
rate
of
$25,000
per
year.
After
the
court
action
in
1983
the
appellant
was
ordered
to
pay
back
certain
sums
as
set
out
above.
This
was
so
because
he
could
not
prove
that
he
had
authority
to
set
up
the
accounts
for
himself,
nor
could
he
substantiate
the
oral
agreement.
His
claim
was
that
he
received
funds
that
had
to
be
accrued
and
that
his
legal
expenses
were
incurred
in
defending
his
income
position.
After
the
court
order
the
appellant
had
a
liability
for
judgment,
interest
and
legal
services.
He
claimed
these
as
a
refund
and
applied
carry
back
provisions
involving
the
1980,
1981
and
1982
taxation
years
when
filing
his
1983
income
tax
return.
In
1984
he
claimed
a
non-capital
loss.
Minister's
Position
Counsel
for
the
Minister
maintained
that
the
appellant
received
the
income
involved
by
reason
of
his
employment
and
as
such
there
is
no
section
in
the
Income
Tax
Act
which
permits
a
deduction
such
as
this,
and
further
if
there
were
a
permissible
deduction
it
would
only
be
in
the
year
of
payment.
This
was
an
attempt
to
maintain
title
to
personal
property
and
income
earned
in
the
past
and
was
a
matter
only
between
the
litigants
in
the
court
action.
It
followed
that
legal
expenses
were
not
incurred
to
earn
income
and
therefore
are
not
deductible.
The
result
of
this,
the
Minister’s
counsel
said
was
that
the
appellant
is
not
entitled
to
the
relief
he
seeks
in
this
appeal.
Analysis
The
income
of
the
appellant
for
1983
was
determined
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
sections
3,
4,
5,
6(1)(a)
and
9(1)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act
thereby
determining
that
there
was
no
non-capital
loss
for
the
1983
taxation
year
that
was
deductible
in
computing
the
taxation
income
of
the
appellant
for
the
1980,
1981,
1982
and
1984
taxation
years
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
paragraphs
111(1
)(a)
and
111(8)(b)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act.
The
Ontario
Court
of
Appeal
case
of
The
Queen
v.
Fred
E.
Poynton,
[1972]
C.T.C.
411;
72
D.T.C.
6329
held
that
moneys
converted
by
a
trustee
to
his
own
use
were
subject
to
repayment
and
still
were
to
be
taxed.
While
in
that
case
there
was
found
to
be
fraud,
and
not
so
here,
the
principle
remains.
The
Poynton
case
was
cited
with
approval
by
the
Supreme
Court
of
Canada
in
The
Queen
v.
Elizabeth
Joan
Savage,
[1983]
C.T.C.
393;
83
D.T.C.
5409.
There
are
many
recorded
cases
in
which
the
court
has
held
that
to
deduct
legal
expenses
such
must
be
attributed
to
matters
dealing
with
the
earning
of
income.
A
most
recent
decision
setting
this
out
is
found
in
the
Federal
Court
of
Appeal
case
of
The
Queen
v.
[1988]
Jager
Homes
Ltd.,
[1988]
1
C.T.C.
215;
88
D.T.C.
6119.
There
was
no
evidence
submitted
as
to
the
connection
between
moneys
obtained
by
the
appellant
over
many
years
that
could
incur
a
business
loss
in
1983.
The
Court
award
against
the
appellant
included
an
amount
of
interest
and
he
sought
to
have
this
deducted.
While
paragraph
20(1)(c)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act
permits
the
deduction
of
interest
in
certain
situations
such
is
not
the
situation
here.
The
purpose
of
this
provision
is
discussed
in
The
Queen
v.
Phyllis
Barbara
Bronfman
Trust,
[1987]
1
C.T.C.
117;
87
D.T.C.
5059
and
certainly
the
appellant
in
this
present
case
cannot
deduct
the
amount
of
interest
against
him
in
the
court
case
with
the
companies
in
his
1983
income
tax
return.
For
all
these
reasons
the
appellants
is
not
permitted
to
claim
a
loss
in
1983
with
the
result
that
this
appeal
is
dismissed.
Appeal
dismissed.