Docket: A-413-18
Citation: 2019 FCA 308
| CORAM:
|
NADON J.A.
RIVOALEN J.A.
LOCKE J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
|
IGOR STUKANOV
|
|
|
Appellant
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
|
|
Respondent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties.
Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 11, 2019.
| REASONS FOR ORDER BY:
|
LOCKE J.A.
|
| CONCURRED IN BY:
|
NADON J.A.
RIVOALEN J.A.
|
Docket: A-413-18
Citation: 2019 FCA 308
| CORAM:
|
NADON J.A.
RIVOALEN J.A.
LOCKE J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
|
IGOR STUKANOV
|
|
|
Appellant
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
|
|
|
Respondent
|
|
|
|
|
|
REASONS FOR ORDER
LOCKE J.A.
[1]
Subsequent to judgment dismissing the present appeal, the appellant wrote a letter to the Court arguing that the reasons for judgment contain several errors, and requesting that they be corrected. The appellant also urges that the award of costs in the judgment be set aside.
[2]
Because judgment has already been rendered, the appellant’s letter will be treated as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 397 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106. This rule permits the Court to reconsider its judgment on the ground either that (i) it does not accord with any reasons given for it; or (ii) a matter that should have been dealt with has been overlooked or accidentally omitted.
[3]
I have considered the whole of the appellant’s letter, including the 17 alleged errors identified therein. What the appellant seeks is actually a rehearing of his appeal, which is not possible. I am not convinced that there is any basis for this Court to reconsider its judgment in this matter. Accordingly, I would make no change to the judgment.
“George R. Locke”
“I agree.
M. Nadon J.A.”
“I agree.
Marianne Rivoalen J.A.”
Email this Content