Tang – Tax Court of Canada finds that translated documents were admissible as they previously had been identified in the list of documents provided to the Crown

Chinese-language documents, that the taxpayer had arranged to have translated into English, were admissible in evidence under Rule 89 given that the list of documents previously provided to the Crown had identified that these documents were translations.

Neal Armstrong. Summary of Tang v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 168 under Rule 89(1)(b).