Docket: A-405-14
Citation: 2015 FCA 138
|
CORAM:
|
TRUDEL J.A.
RYER J.A.
RENNIE J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
LAWRENCE WATTS
|
|
Appellant
|
|
and
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
|
|
Respondent
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 3, 2015).
RYER J.A.
[1]
This is an appeal from an order of Chief Justice
Eugene Rossiter of the Tax Court of Canada, dated September 22, 2014, in Docket
2014-1231(IT)G. In that matter, Mr. Lawrence Watts appealed to the Tax Court of
Canada, by Notice of Appeal dated December 9, 2013, to vacate assessments of
income tax and penalties that were imposed upon him under the Income Tax Act,
R.S.C. 1985, c.1 (5th Supp.), by notice of assessment, dated May 28, 2009, in
respect of his 2007 taxation year (the “2007
Reassessment”) and by notice of reassessment, dated November 22, 2012,
in respect of his 2009 and 2010 taxation years (the “2009
and 2010 Reassessments”).
[2]
In an earlier Amended Notice of Appeal, dated
January 9, 2012, Mr. Watts appealed to the Tax Court of Canada to vacate the
2007 Reassessment. However, that Amended Notice of Appeal was struck from the
record and the appeal was dismissed by the order of Justice Diane Campbell of
the Tax Court of Canada, dated January 30, 2013
[3]
A motion by Mr. Watts, pursuant to Rule 140 (2)
of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure), SOR/90-688a,
to set aside Justice Campbell’s order was dismissed by Justice Brent Paris of
the Tax Court of Canada, by order dated November 8, 2013. In the transcript of
his oral reasons for refusing to set aside Justice Campbell’s order, Justice
Paris determined that Justice Campbell’s order struck out Mr. Watts’ Amended
Notice of Appeal and dismissed his appeal on the merits of the Crown’s motion
to strike and not because of Mr. Watts’ failure to appear before Justice
Campbell. Justice Paris further stated that Justice Campbell’s order could only
be challenged by way of an appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal.
[4]
In the order of the Chief Justice, which is
before us in this appeal, he:
a) Granted the Crown’s motion to strike out a portion of Mr. Watts’
Notice of Appeal, dated December 9, 2013, that related to his 2007 taxation
year;
b)
Permitted Mr. Watts to file an amended Notice of
Appeal not later than October 31, 2014 with respect to his 2009 and 2010
taxation years;
c)
Permitted the Crown to file a reply no later
than December 31, 2014; and
d)
Awarded costs to the Crown in the amount of
$500.
[5]
The oral reasons of the Chief Justice
demonstrate his conclusion that the order of Justice Campbell was a final
determination with respect to the validity of the 2007 Reassessment, pursuant
to which the Minister imposed a liability under the Income Tax Act upon
Mr. Watts. This conclusion led him to find that Mr. Watts was precluded from
relitigating the validity of the 2007 Reassessment by virtue of the principle
of res judicata.
[6]
We have not been persuaded that in granting the
Crown’s motion to strike out the portion of Mr. Watts’ Notice of Appeal that
relates to the 2007 Reassessment, the Chief Justice made any reviewable error
of law or fact that would warrant our intervention.
[7]
Mr. Watts has requested this Court to grant him
an extension of time to file an amendment to his Notice of Appeal with respect
to the 2009 and 2010 Reassessments, as permitted by the order of the Chief
Justice. This relief is within the purview of the Tax Court of Canada and should
be requested from that Court.
[8]
For the foregoing reasons, we would dismiss the
appeal, with all inclusive costs in the amount of $1,000.
"C. Michael Ryer"
Email this Content