Docket: A-41-15
Citation: 2015 FCA 230
|
CORAM:
|
NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
SCOTT J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
RICHARD TIMM
|
|
Appellant
|
|
and
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
|
|
Respondent
|
Heard
at Montréal, Quebec, on October 27, 2015.
Judgement delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on October
27, 2015.
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
|
TRUDEL
J.A.
|
Docket: A-41-15
Citation: 2015 FCA 230
|
CORAM:
|
NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
SCOTT J.A.
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
RICHARD TIMM
|
|
Appellant
|
|
and
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
|
|
Respondent
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF
THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Montréal,
Quebec, on October 27, 2015.)
TRUDEL J.A.
[1]
Litigants are entitled to coherent reasons that
allow them to understand why they have won or lost their case, especially when it
comes to an order allowing a motion for summary judgment dismissing an action
without the plaintiff being accorded a hearing.
[2]
Here, the Federal Court judge issued an order
with reasons in the form of a preamble (a speaking order) from which it is
impossible to tell why he dismissed the appellant’s action (Docket No. T-1445-13).
[3]
We sympathize with the appellant’s argument that
a reasonable person who is well-informed of the facts of the case could, upon
objective review of these facts, fear that the judge hearing the motion was
biased or, at the very least, that the appellant’s judicial history led the
judge to form an opinion too quickly.
[4]
This argument specifically refers to the second
and third paragraphs of page 2 of the order under appeal, where the judge began
by describing the appellant’s judicial history, even though this description was
quite unnecessary for the disposal of the motion.
[5]
Having said that, we do not have to decide this
issue given that we agree that the inadequacy of the reasons given by the
Federal Court is sufficient to dispose of this appeal.
[6]
Consequently, the appeal will be allowed with
costs, the decision of the Federal Court dated January 2, 2015, will be set
aside, and the matter will be referred back to the Chief Justice of the Federal
Court so that the motion can be redetermined by another judge of this court.
“Johanne Trudel”
TRANSLATION
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD
|
DOCKET:
|
A-41-15
|
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
RICHARD TIMM v.
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
|
|
|
PLACE OF HEARING:
|
Montréal, Quebec
|
|
DATE OF HEARING:
|
October 27, 2015
|
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY:
|
NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
SCOTT J.A.
|
|
DELIVERED
FROM THE BENCH BY:
|
TRUDEL J.A.
|
|
|
|
|
APPEARANCES:
|
Pierre Tabah
Julie Durocher
|
For the
appellant
|
|
Toni Abi Nasr
|
For the
respondent
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Labelle, Côté, Tabah et Associés
Saint-Jérôme
Durocher & Durocher,
avocats Ltée
Saint-Jérôme
|
For the
appellant
|
|
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
For the
respondent
|