[1] We are not persuaded that, in dismissing the applicants' appeals against the reassessment of their tax liability for the years 1996 and 1997, the Tax Court Judge committed any reviewable error. We see no basis at all for the applicants' allegation that the Judge's conduct of the hearing gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

[2] For these reasons, the application will be dismissed with costs fixed in the amount of $3000 inclusive of disbursements.

"John M. Evans"

J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET: A-350-01

STYLE OF CAUSE: VASUNDARA RAGHAVAN &

GOPALACHARI RAGHAVAN

Applicants

- and -

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2002

PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT BY: EVANS, J.A.

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH AT TORONTO, ONTARIO ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2002.

DATED: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2002

APPEARANCES BY: Ms. Vasundara Raghavan

Mr. Gopalachari Raghavan

For the Applicants, on her and his own behalf

Ms. Lesley King

Mr. David Spiro

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Vasundara Raghavan

Gopalachari Raghavan

756 Bloor Street East, Apt. "B"

Mississauga, Ontario

L4Y 2M6

For the Applicants, on her and his own behalf

Morris Rosenburg

Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For the Respondent

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Date: 20020924

Docket: A-350-01

BETWEEN:

VASUNDARA RAGHAVAN &

GOPALACHARI RAGHAVAN

Applicants

- and -

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

OF THE COURT

You are here

Raghavan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2002 FCA 343

Citations2002 FCA 343

Case tabs

Citations
2002 FCA 343