Date: 20071213
Docket: A-138-03
Citation: 2007 FCA 403
BETWEEN:
FAIDY
FOUAD NAGUIB
Appellant
and
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF
COSTS - REASONS
Charles E. Stinson
Assessment Officer
[1]
The
Court dismissed with costs this appeal of a decision of the Tax Court of Canada
concerning net worth reassessment. I issued a timetable for written disposition
of the assessment of the Respondent's amended bill of costs.
[2]
The
Appellant did not file any materials in response to the Respondent's materials.
My view, often expressed in comparable circumstances, is that the Federal
Courts Rules do not contemplate a litigant benefiting by having an
assessment officer step away from a neutral position to act as the litigant's
advocate in challenging given items in a bill of costs. However, the assessment
officer cannot certify unlawful items, i.e. those outside the authority of the
judgment and the tariff. I examined each item claimed in the amended bill of
costs and the supporting materials within those parameters.
[3]
Certain
items warrant my intervention as I feel that the Respondent cannot establish
entitlement thereto notwithstanding the absence of objections from the
Appellant. The amended bill of costs claimed a counsel fee item 21(a) for two
motions addressing the contents of the appeal book. As the resultant orders
were silent on costs, I am satisfied further to my conclusions in Balisky v.
Canada (Minister of
Natural Resources), [2004] F.C.J. No. 536 at para. 6 (A.O.) and Aird
v. Country
Park Village Properties
(Mainland) Ltd., [2005] F.C.J. No. 1426 at para. 10 (A.O.), that I have no
jurisdiction to allow item 21(a). As well, I have reduced the claimed
disbursement total by $205.00 to account for these motions. The Respondent's
amended bill of costs, presented at $3,524.49, is assessed and allowed at
$2,599.49.
"Charles
E. Stinson"
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-138-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: FAIDY FOUAD NAGUIB v. HMQ
ASSESSMENT
OF COSTS IN WRITING WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES
REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: CHARLES
E. STINSON
DATED: December
13, 2007
WRITTEN
REPRESENTATIONS:
|
n/a
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Ms. Kandia
Aird
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
Marciano
Beckenstein LLP
Concord, ON
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
John H. Sims,
Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|