Date: 20061128
Docket: A-70-06
Citation: 2006 FCA 387
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
EVANS J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
WING WAH FOOD MANUFACTORY PRODUCTS INC.
Appellant
and
CHINA
BRANDS FOOD PRODUCTS INC.
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November
28, 2006.
Judgment delivered from the
Bench at Toronto,
Ontario, on November
28, 2006.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: MALONE
J.A.
Date: 20061128
Docket: A-70-06
Citation: 2006 FCA 387
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
EVANS
J.A.
MALONE
J.A.
BETWEEN:
WING
WAH FOOD MANUFACTORY PRODUCTS INC.
Appellant
and
CHINA
BRANDS FOOD PRODUCTS INC.
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 28, 2006)
MALONE J.A.
[1]
This is an
appeal from an order of Hansen J., a judge of the Federal Court dated November
28, 2005 (reported as 2005 FC 1611). The Judge upheld a decision of the
Trade-Marks Opposition Board (the Board) which permitted the respondent to
register the trade-mark PEONY Brand & Design.
[2]
The
principal issue before the Judge was whether the Board correctly decided that
there was a transfer of business, including the rights in the trade-mark at
issue from a partnership created in 1978 to the respondent corporation
incorporated in 1986. Reviewing on the basis of reasonableness simpliciter,
the Judge determined that it was reasonable for the Board to find that China
Brands Inc. was incorporated to take over the business of the partnership and
that the evidence clearly established this. Further, she concluded that the
respondent’s failure to renew the registration of the name of the partnership
under the Partnership Registration Act did not affect the existence of
the partnership. Rather, the question of whether a partnership existed or not was
determined by the real intention of the parties as evidenced by their conduct
taking into consideration all surrounding circumstances.
[3]
Considering
the evidence as a whole, we are not persuaded that Hansen J. was wrong to
conclude that the Registrar’s findings on the basis of the evidence before
him were not unreasonable.
[4]
The appeal
should be dismissed with costs.
“B. Malone”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-70-06
APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE
MADAM JUSTICE HANSEN DATED NOVEMBER 28, 2005, DOCKET NO. T-262-05
STYLE OF CAUSE: Wing Wah Food Manufactory Products Inc. v. China Brands Food
Products Inc.
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: November 28, 2006
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY: Linden,
Evans & Malone JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Malone J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Kenneth McKay
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
Mark Robbins
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Sim, Lowman, Ashton
& McKay
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE
APPELLANT
|
Bereskin &
Parr
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE
RESPONDENT
|
Date: 20061128
Docket: A-70-06
Toronto, Ontario, November 28, 2006
CORAM: LINDEN J.A.
EVANS
J.A.
MALONE J.A.
BETWEEN:
WING
WAH FOOD MANUFACTORY PRODUCTS INC.
Appellant
and
CHINA
BRANDS FOOD PRODUCTS INC.
Respondent
JUDGMENT
The appeal is dismissed with
costs.
“A. M. Linden”