Date:
20080512
Docket:
A-460-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 181
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
MICHELE ARVONIO
residing and domiciled at 140 Mozard Street,
town of Dollard-des-Ormeaux,
province of Quebec, H9G 2Z9
and
MICHÈLE NADON
residing and domiciled at 35 Des Trilles Road,
city of Laval, province of Quebec, H7Y 1K1
and
JEAN ST-LAURENT
residing and domiciled at 155 Northcote Street,
town of Pincourt, province of Quebec, J7V 5E1
Applicants
and
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AIRLINE DIVISION, having an office at 975
Roméo-Vachon Street,
4th floor, suite 465 (Pierre-Elliot Trudeau International Airport,
Terminal Building), city of Dorval, province of
Quebec, H4Y 1H1
and
AIR CANADA
Respondents
Hearing held
at Montréal, Quebec, on May 12, 2008.
Judgment
delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on May 12, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON
J.A.
Date:
20080512
Docket:
A-460-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 181
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
PELLETIER
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
MICHELE ARVONIO
residing and domiciled at 140 Mozard Street,
town of Dollard-des-Ormeaux,
province of Quebec, H9G 2Z9
and
MICHÈLE NADON
residing and domiciled at 35 Chemin des
Trilles,
city of Laval, province of Quebec, H7Y 1K1
and
JEAN ST-LAURENT
residing and domiciled at 155 Northcote Street,
town of Pincourt, province of Quebec, J7V 5E1
Applicants
and
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
AIRLINE DIVISION, having an office at 975
Roméo-Vachon Street,
4th floor, suite 465 (Pierre-Elliot Trudeau International Airport,
Terminal Building), city of Dorval, province of
Quebec, H4Y 1H1
and
AIR CANADA
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered
from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on May 12, 2008.)
NADON J.A.
[1]
This
is an application for judicial review of a decision by the Canada Industrial
Relations Board (the Board) dated September 11, 2007.
[2]
By
its decision, the Board dismissed three complaints filed by the applicants
under section 37 of the Canada Labour Code (the Code) against their
union, the respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Airline Division, for
breach of their duties of good faith and of fair representation, because the
complaints had not been filed within the 90-day time limit prescribed under
section 97 of the Code.
[3]
More
specifically, the Board stated that it was of the view that the application for
judicial review filed by the applicants on November 29,
2004,
in the Quebec Superior Court had not stopped the running of the time limit
under subsection 97(2) of the Code. Moreover, exercising its discretion under
section 16 of the Code, the Board concluded that, in the circumstances, there
were no grounds for extending the 90-day limit.
[4]
Despite
the very able argument of counsel for the applicants, Ms. Pilon, we are of the
opinion that, regardless of the standard of review applied, the Board did not
make any error in concluding as it did.
[5]
The
application for judicial review will therefore be dismissed with costs.
“M. Nadon”
Certified
true translation
Michael
Palles
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-460-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: MICHELE ARVONIO ET AL. v.
CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES ET AL.
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: May
12, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT BY: NADON
J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON
J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Josée Pilon
|
FOR
THE APPLICANTS
|
|
Sean T. McGee
Michael
McCrory
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
CANADIAN
UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
AIR
CANADA
|
|
|
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
Braman Barbacki Moreau
Montréal,
Quebec
|
FOR THE APPLICANTS
|
|
Nelligan O’Brien Payne
Ottawa, Ontario
Air
Canada
Montréal,
Quebec
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
CANADIAN
UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
AIR CANADA
|