Date:
20080123
Docket: A-132-07
Citation: 2008 FCA 28
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
NADON J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JENNIFER
LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January
23, 2008.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 23, 2008.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NADON
J.A.
Date:
20080123
Docket: A-132-07
Citation:
2008 FCA 28
CORAM: DÉCARY
J.A.
NADON
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JENNIFER
LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered
from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January
23, 2008)
[1]
This
is a borderline case. On the particulars facts of the case, we cannot conclude,
on a standard of reasonableness, that the Umpire erred in refusing to interfere
with the decision of the Board of Referees which found that the respondent had
shown good cause for delaying her application for benefits.
[2]
Accordingly,
the Attorney General’s judicial review application will be dismissed with
costs.
“M. Nadon”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-132-07
(AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF A
DECISION OF THE HON. MR. JUSTICE HADDAD, AS UMPIRE, DATED JANUARY 16, 2007.
EMPLYOMENT INSURANCE. FILE: CUB 67658)
STYLE OF CAUSE: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
and
JENNIFER LYNNE EDMISON
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO,
ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: JANUARY 23, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT BY:
(DÉCARY, NADON, TRUDEL J.J.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NADON
J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Adam Rambert
|
FOR THE APPELLANT/
APPLICANT
|
|
Annie M.K.
Finn
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE
APPELLANT/
APPLICANT
|
|
Fasken
Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Barristers and Solicitors
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE
RESPONDENT
|
Email this Content