Date:
20100112
Docket: A-148-09
Citation: 2010 FCA 8
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
BETWEEN:
NPS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Appellant
and
BIOFARMA,
SOCIÉTÉ PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIÉE
Respondent
Heard at Toronto,
Ontario, on January 12,
2010.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 12, 2010.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU
J.A.
Date:
20100112
Docket:
A-148-09
Citation:
2010 FCA 8
CORAM: LÉTOURNEAU
J.A.
NOËL
J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
NPS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Appellant
and
BIOFARMA,
SOCIÉTÉ PAR ACTIONS SIMPLIFIÉE
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered
from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on January 12, 2010)
LÉTOURNEAU
J.A.
[1]
In
essence the appellant raises before us the same arguments he submitted to both
the Trademarks Opposition Board and Lemieux J. of the Federal Court.
[2]
Justice
Lemieux addressed these arguments for a second time in detailed reasons in
support of his decision to dismiss the appellant’s appeal with costs: see NPS
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Biofarma, 2009 FC 172, [2009] F.C. J. No. 255
(QL).
[3]
Despite
the valuable efforts by counsel for the appellant, we see in the learned
judge’s decision no error, whether of law or of a palpable and overriding
nature, which would require or justify our intervention.
[4]
For
these reasons the appeal will be dismissed with costs.
“Gilles Létourneau”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-148-09
STYLE OF CAUSE: NPS
PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. v.
BIOFARMA, SOCIÉTÉ PAR ACTIONS
SIMPLIFIÉE
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: January 12, 2010
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A.
TRUDEL J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
David J. McGruder
|
FOR
THE APPELLANT
|
|
Louis
Gratton
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP
Vancouver, B.C.
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
|
Ogilvy Renault S.E.N.C.R.L., s.r.l.
Montréal, Quebec
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|