Date: 20091112
Docket: A-103-09
Citation: 2009 FCA 327
CORAM: NADON J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
VALON
KONE BRUNETTE LTD. and
BDR MACHINERY LTD.
Appellants
and
REALSEARCH INC. and
DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
Respondents
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November
12, 2009.
Judgment delivered from the
Bench at Toronto,
Ontario, on November
12, 2009.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
PELLETIER J.A.
Date: 20091112
Docket: A-103-09
Citation: 2009 FCA 327
CORAM: NADON
J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
TRUDEL
J.A.
BETWEEN:
VALON KONE BRUNETTE LTD. and
BDR MACHINERY LTD.
Appellants
and
REALSEARCH INC. and
DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE
COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on November 12,
2009)
PELLETIER J.A._
[1]
We are all of the view that the appellants have
not met the burden of showing that the order under appeal is the product of
“the clearest case of the misuse of judicial discretion” as was said in L’Hirondelle
v. Canada, 2001 FCA 399 at paragraph 4.
[2]
There was evidence to support the judge’s
conclusion that Realsearch Inc. had assets available to satisfy the amount of
costs claimed. We are also satisfied that the judge did not take into account
any assets owned by Dingwall’s Machinery and Supply Ltd.
[3]
As a result, there is no basis for our
intervention. The appeal should be dismissed with costs.
“J.D.
Denis Pelletier”
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-103-09
(APPEAL FROM AN AMENDED ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE
MR. JUSTICE SIMON NOËL DATED FEBRUARY 16,
2009, DOCKET NO. T-1300-02)
STYLE OF CAUSE: VALON KONE BRUNETTE LTD. and BDR MACHINERY LTD. v. REALSEARCH INC.
and DINGWELL’S MACHINERY & SUPPLY LTD.
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: November 12, 2009
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: (NADON, PELLETIER & TRUDEL JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: PELLETIER J.A.
APPEARANCES:
|
Michael
Crinson/Geoffrey Mowatt
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
David W.
Aitken
|
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Dimock Stratton LLP
Toronto, Ontario
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
|
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Ottawa, Ontario
|
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
|