Date: 20130724
Docket: A-121-12
Citation: 2013 FCA 187
CORAM: NOËL
J.A.
PELLETIER
J.A.
GAUTHIER
J.A.
BETWEEN:
APOTEX INC., and
APOTEX PHARMACHEM INC.
Appellants
and
SANOFI-AVENTIS and BRISTOL-MYERS
SQUIBB
SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS
PARTNERSHIP
Respondents
Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on January 28 & 29, 2013.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on July 24, 2013.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: PELLETIER
J.A.
CONCURRED
IN BY: NOËL
J.A.
GAUTHIER
J.A.
.
Date: 20130724
Docket: A-121-12
Citation: 2013 FCA 187
CORAM: NOËL
J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
GAUTHIER
J.A.
BETWEEN:
APOTEX INC., and
APOTEX PHARMACHEM INC.
Appellants
and
SANOFI-AVENTIS and BRISTOL-MYERS
SQUIBB
SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS
PARTNERSHIP
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
PELLETIER J.A.
[1]
This
is an appeal from the order of costs made following a 26 day trial in which the
Federal Court found that Canadian Patent No. 1,336,777 (the ‘777 Patent) was
invalid for lack of utility and obviousness. The appellants argue that the Federal
Court erred in denying them certain of their disbursements. In File No. A-7-12,
this Court overturned the Federal Court’s decision, upheld the validity of the
‘777 Patent, and ordered costs against the appellant Apotex in this Court and
in the Federal Court. As a result, this appeal is now moot.
[2]
The
appeal should therefore be dismissed.
"J.D. Denis
Pelletier"
“I agree
Marc
Noël J.A.”
“I agree
Johanne
Gauthier J.A.”
FEDERAL COURT OF
APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-121-12
STYLE OF CAUSE: APOTEX
INC. and APOTEX PHARMACHEM INC. and SANOFI-AVENTIS and BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
SANOFI PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS PARTNERSHIP
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: January
28 and 29, 2013
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BY: PELLETIER
J.A.
CONCURRED IN BY: NOËL
J.A. &
GAUTHIER J.A.
DATED: July
24, 2013
APPEARANCES:
Anthony
G. Creber / Cristin A. Wagner /
Marc
Richard
|
FOR
THE APPELLANTS
|
Harry
Radomski / Benjamin Hackett /
Richard
Naiberg / Sandon Shogilev
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENTS
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Gowling
Lafleur Henderson LLP,
Ottawa
|
FOR THE APPELLANTS
|
GGODMANS
LLP,
Toronto
|
FOR
THE RESPONDENTS
|