Date: 20000920
Docket: A-832-96
Coram: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
Between:
Jean-Charles St-Onge
Appellant
(Applicant)
- and -
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
(Respondent)
Hearing held at Ottawa, Ontario, on Wednesday, September 20, 2000
Judgment delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on Wednesday, September 20, 2000.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A.
Date: 20000920
Docket: A-832-96
Coram: DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
NOËL J.A.
Between:
Jean-Charles St-Onge
Appellant
(Applicant)
- and -
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
(Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Ottawa, Ontario,
on Wednesday, September 20, 2000)
NOËL J.A.
[1] As the Trial Judge stated and particularly in light of the history of the case as described on pages 5 and 6 of his reasons, we are of the view that he was correct in concluding that the decision of the Canadian Human Rights Commission was not patently unreasonable.
[2] The appeal will be dismissed without costs.
Marc Noël
J.A.
Certified true translation
Monica F. Chamberlain
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE NO.: A-832-96
STYLE OF CAUSE:
JEAN-CHARLES ST-ONGE v. THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: OTTAWA, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: September 20, 2000
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (DESJARDINS, DÉCARY AND
NOËL J.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Jean-Charles St-Onge
REPRESENTING HIMSELF
Rosemarie Millar
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Jean-Charles St-Onge
Ottawa, Ontario
REPRESENTING HIMSELF
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT
Email this Content