Date: 20000515
Docket: A-711-98
BETWEEN:
MADELEINE DU MESNIL
Applicant
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on Monday, May 15, 2000
Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on Monday, May 15, 2000
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: DÉCARY J.A.
Date: 20000515
Docket: A-711-98
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NOËL J.A.
BETWEEN:
MADELEINE DU MESNIL
Applicant
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal,
Quebec, on Monday, May 15, 2000)
DÉCARY J.A.
[1] Despite Mr. de Merchant's argument, we are not convinced that there is any reason to intervene except, of course, with respect to the weeks which the respondent recognizes as weeks of unemployment.
Page: 2
[2] The application for judicial review will be allowed, the umpire's decision will be set aside and the matter will be referred back to the chief umpire or to an umpire designated by him for redetermination on the basis that the weeks between July 12, 1993, and December 10, 1993, were weeks of unemployment, but that the other weeks were not. There will be no award of costs.
Robert Décary
J.A.
Certified true translation
Peter Douglas
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
APPEAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
| STYLE OF CAUSE: MADELEINE DU MESNIL |
Applicant
- and -
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
| PLACE OF HEARING: MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC |
| DATE OF HEARING: MONDAY, MAY 15, 2000 |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY
DÉCARY J.A.
| APPEARANCES: William de Merchant |
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
| Campeau, Ouellet, Nadon, Barabé, Cyr, de Merchant, Bernstein, Cousineau, Heap, Palardy
Avocats
1406 Beaudry Street
P.O. Box 95, Station C
Montréal, Quebec
H2L 4J7
|
Morris Rosenberg
Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
|
| Office of the umpire
Place de Ville, Tower B
112 Kent Street, 9th floor
P.O. Box 8966
Ottawa, Ontario
K1G 3J2
|
|
Email this Content