Date: 20001212
Docket: A-400-99
ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MCDONALD, J.A.
| IN THE MATTER OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, S.C. 1996, c. E-5.6 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL COURT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, |
BETWEEN:
DOUG A. SUMANAC
Applicant
- and -
CANADA EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondents
Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, on Tuesday, December 12th, 2000
Delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on Tuesday, December 12th, 2000
| REASONS FOR BY: STRAYER, J.A. |
| CONCURRED BY: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. |
| CONCURRED BY: MCDONALD, J.A. |
Date: 20001212
Docket: A-400-99
ROTHSTEIN, J.A.
MCDONALD, J.A.
| IN THE MATTER OF THE EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT, S.C. 1996, c. E-5.6 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL COURT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, |
BETWEEN:
DOUG A. SUMANAC
Applicant
- and -
CANADA EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE COMMISSION
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondents
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta
on December 12, 2000.)
STRAYER, J.A.:
We are all satisfied that the Board of Referees applied the correct principles and had evidence before it upon which it could conclude as it did.
We therefore confirm the decision of the Umpire limiting as he did the imposition of the penalties to the 10 false statements on the report cards.
"B.L. Strayer"
J.A.
EDMONTON, Alberta
December 12th, 2000.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-400-99
STYLE OF CAUSE: Doug A. Sumanac v. Canada Employment
Insurance Commission and The Attorney
General of Canada
PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta
DATE OF HEARING: December 12th, 2000
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Strayer, J.A.
| CONCURRED IN BY: Rothstein, J.A. |
McDonald, J.A.
DATED: December 12th, 2000
APPEARANCES:
Franco P. Tarulli FOR THE APPLICANT
Julia S. Parker FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Department of Justice
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
| Oshry & Company FOR THE APPLICANT |
Morris A. Rosenberg FOR THE RESPONDENTS
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Email this Content