SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
| Citation: R. v. Seruhungo, 2016 SCC 2, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 9 |
Appeal heard: January 15, 2016 Judgment rendered: January 15, 2016 Docket: 36523 |
Between:
Akeem Smith Seruhungo
Appellant
and
Her Majesty The Queen
Respondent
Coram: Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté JJ.
| Reasons for Judgment: (paras. 1 to 2) |
Moldaver J. (Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté JJ. concurring) |
R. v. Seruhungo, 2016 SCC 2, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 9
Akeem Smith Seruhungo Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. Seruhungo
2016 SCC 2
File No.: 36523.
2016: January 15.
Present: Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for alberta
Criminal law — Evidence — Corroboration — Hearsay — Trial judge properly considering confirmatory evidence — Trial judge’s error concerning test for hearsay not affecting result at trial — Accused’s acquittal for manslaughter restored.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (Bielby, O’Ferrall and Brown JJ.A.), 2015 ABCA 189, 600 A.R. 356, 23 Alta. L.R. (6th) 318, 324 C.C.C. (3d) 491, 645 W.A.C. 356, [2015] A.J. No. 601 (QL), 2015 CarswellAlta 969 (WL Can.), setting aside the accused’s acquittal and ordering a new trial. Appeal allowed, Moldaver and Gascon JJ. dissenting.
Deborah R. Hatch and Morgan McClelland, for the appellant.
Melanie Hayes-Richards, for the respondent.
The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by
[1] Moldaver J. — A majority of the Court would allow the appeal and restore the acquittal substantially for the reasons of O’Ferrall J.A. Moldaver and Gascon JJ. would dismiss the appeal substantially for the reasons of Brown J.A.
[2] In the result, the appeal is allowed and the acquittal is restored.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Hatch McClelland Moore, Edmonton.
Solicitor for the respondent: Attorney General of Alberta, Edmonton.
Email this Content