R. v. Bekoe, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 90
Doris Bekoe Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v. Bekoe
File No.: 25615.
1998: January 30.
Present: Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major and
Bastarache JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario
Criminal law ‑‑ Evidence ‑‑
Welfare fraud arising from non‑reporting of change of marital status ‑‑
Defence evidence as to traditional African marriage rejected at trial ‑‑
Trial judge not misapprehending defence evidence.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal,
[1996] O.J. No. 3377 (QL), dismissing the accused’s appeal from her
conviction for fraud. Appeal dismissed.
Michael Lomer, for the
appellant.
Beverly A. Brown, for
the respondent.
//Cory J.//
The judgment of the Court
was delivered orally by
1 Cory
J. ‑‑ We are all of the view that there was no error in the
reasons and conclusion of the majority of the Court of Appeal.
2 This appeal as of right is
therefore dismissed.
Judgment accordingly.
Solicitors for the appellant: Lomer,
Frost, Toronto.
Solicitor for the respondent: The
Attorney General for Ontario, Toronto.