R. v. Pasini, [1992] 1 S.C.R.
1017
Claude Laberge Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
André Dufresne Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Jacques Côté and Pierre Côté Appellants
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Robert Lavigne, Serge Joly
and Pierre Joly Appellants
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Marie‑France Pasini and Benoît
Ratté Appellants
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Gilbert Wasser Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Michel Juneau Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
and between
Gérard Deslongchamps Appellant
v.
Her Majesty The Queen Respondent
Indexed as: R. v.
Pasini
File Nos.: 22356, 22357,
22360, 22361, 22363, 22364, 22666 and 22730.
1992: April 29.
Present: La Forest,
L'Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, McLachlin, Stevenson and Iacobucci JJ.
on appeal from the court of appeal for
quebec
Constitutional law ‑‑
Charter of Rights ‑‑ Trial within a reasonable time ‑‑
Stays of proceedings ordered by Superior Court judge quashed.
APPEALS from a
judgment of the Quebec Court of Appeal, [1991] R.J.Q. 669, 63 C.C.C. (3d) 436,
4 C.R. (4th) 188, allowing the Crown's appeal and quashing the stays of
proceedings ordered by the Superior Court, R.J.P.Q. 88‑151. Appeals
dismissed.
Jean‑Claude
Hébert, for the
appellant Laberge.
Sophie Bourque, for the appellant Dufresne.
Bernard Lamarche, for the appellants Côté, Juneau,
Ratté and Deslongchamps.
Danielle Roy, for the appellants Lavigne and Joly.
Sylvain De Lagrave, for the appellant Pasini.
Alain Régnier, for the appellant Wasser.
Michel Denis, for the respondent.
//La Forest//
English version of
the judgment of the Court delivered orally by
La Forest
J. ‑‑ It will not be necessary to hear from you Mr. Denis. The
Court is ready to hand down judgment. The judgment will be pronounced by Mr.
Justice Gonthier.
Gonthier J. -- These are appeals as of
right from a decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal quashing stays of
proceedings on grounds of unreasonable delay ordered by Tannenbaum J. We
are all in agreement with the Court of Appeal's conclusion that in the
exceptional circumstances of this case it was open to the prosecution to
exercise its discretion to declare a stay of proceedings by way of nolle
prosequi and that there were no grounds for the stay of proceedings ordered
by Tannenbaum J.
Accordingly, the
appeals are dismissed.
Judgment
accordingly.
Solicitors for the
appellants Laberge and Dufresne: Hébert, Bourque, Montréal.
Solicitors for the
appellants Côté, Ratté and Juneau: Barrière, Côté, Girard, Lamarche,
Pinard & Rumanek, Montréal.
Solicitor for the
appellants Lavigne and Joly: Danielle Roy, Montréal.
Solicitor for the
appellant Pasini: Sylvain De Lagrave, Montréal.
Solicitor for the
appellant Wasser: Alain Régnier, Montréal.
Solicitors for the
appellant Deslongchamps: Melançon, Bertrand & Associés, Laval.
Solicitor for the
respondent: Michel Denis, Montréal.