Docket:
IMM-13238-12
Citation: 2013 FC 1082
Toronto, Ontario, October
24, 2013
PRESENT: The
Honourable Madam Justice Simpson
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
PATRICIA JOSEPH
|
|
Applicant
|
|
and
|
|
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
|
|
Respondent
|
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
(Reasons delivered orally on October
23, 2013)
[1]
The hearing of the Applicant’s refugee claim, in
which she alleges that she is an abused spouse from St. Lucia, has had a
difficult history. The hearing has taken more than two years to complete and
its commencement was adjourned many times based on medical opinions because the
Applicant is very ill. She has severe Lupus and it was a life threatening
condition at the time of her refugee hearing.
[2]
The hearing before the Immigration and Refugee
Board [the Board] which was scheduled on a peremptory basis was unexpectedly held
in two stages. The first stage was adjourned because, due to her illness, the Applicant
was incapable of continuing. The circumstances were difficult, and there is no
criticism of the Board’s treatment of the Applicant during the hearing.
The Issues
[3]
The issues are:
i)
Was there a failure of natural justice?
ii)
Did the Board ignore the Applicant’s evidence
about the length of her relationship with her abusive common law spouse?
iii)
Did the Board ignore relevant medical evidence?
Issue 1.
[4]
The Board twice advised counsel for the
Applicant that two issues were outstanding and that they were to be the only
focus of both counsel’s questions of the Applicant and her final submissions on
the Applicant’s behalf. These issues so identified were “credibility” and “state
protection.” The existence or otherwise of a “subjective fear” was not included
in the topics to be addressed.
[5]
The Board’s screening form lists “delay” as a
factor to be considered when the Board is determining whether an Applicant has demonstrated
“subjective fear.” The screening form does not list “delay” as a factor to be
considered under the heading “credibility.” For this reason counsel for the
Applicant did not question the Applicant or make submissions about the
Applicant’s delay of approximately two years in making her refugee claim [the
Delay].
[6]
Thus, the Applicant’s explanation for the Delay
was not fully presented to the Board.
[7]
The panel’s negative decision of November 23,
2012 was based in part on the Board’s conclusion that the Delay had not been
adequately explained.
[8]
For this reason, there has been a material
breach of the rules of natural justice.
[9]
This finding makes it unnecessary to consider
the remaining issues.
Certification
[10]
No question was posed for certification.
ORDER
THIS COURT ORDERS that the application
for judicial review is allowed and the matter is sent back for redetermination
by a differently constituted panel of the Board.
FURTHER ORDER
UPON NOTING that the circumstances of
this case were unusual in that counsel for the Applicant (without supporting
medical evidence) repeatedly submitted to the Board and to this Court that the
Applicant’s illness and treatment meant that her memory had failed and that she
was not capable of participating in her hearing [the Submissions].
To
avoid a repetition of the unsupported Submissions, Applicant’s counsel is
hereby directed that, if she wishes to make the Submissions at any future
hearing she will be entitled to do so only if she files timely medical opinions
from recognized experts on the topics listed below:
1.
The Applicant’s capacity to understand questions
and provide responsive answers at a hearing.
2.
The effectiveness, strength, and reliability of
the Applicant’s memory.
“Sandra J. Simpson”
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
|
DOCKET:
|
IMM-13238-12
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
PATRICIA JOSEPH v THE MINISTER OF
CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
|
PLACE OF HEARING:
Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING:
OCTOBER
23, 2013
REASONS FOR
ORDER AND ORDER:
SIMPSON
J.
DATED:
October
24, 2013
APPEARANCES:
|
Stella Iriah Anaele
|
For The Applicant
|
|
Veronica Cham
|
For The Respondent
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Stella Iriah Anaele
Barrister and Solicitor
Toronto, Ontario
|
For The Applicant
|
|
William F. Pentney
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
|
For The Respondent
|