Date: 20080918
Docket: T-791-07
Citation: 2008 FC 1046
Ottawa, Ontario, September 18, 2008
PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes
BETWEEN:
ZANDRINA
CARTER
Applicant
and
ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
TRANSCRIPT OF REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
Let the attached edited version
of the transcript of my Reasons for Judgment delivered orally from the bench at
Toronto,
Ontario,
on Monday, September 15, 2008, be filed to comply with section 51 of the Federal
Courts Act.
JUDGMENT
THIS COURT ADJUDGES that this application for judicial review be dismissed.
“ R. L. Barnes ”
Court File No. T-791-07
FEDERAL
COURT OF CANADA
BETWEEN:
ZANDRINA CARTER
Applicant
-
and -
ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
HEARD BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
MR. JUSTICE BARNES
in the Courts Administration
Service, Courtroom 4C,
180 Queen Street West,
Toronto, Ontario
on
Monday, September 15, 2008 at 11:06 a.m.
ORAL REASONS AND DECISION
APPEARANCES:
Zandrina Carter
Nicole
Carter Agent
for the Applicant
Ms.
Sandra Gruescu For
the Respondent
Also
Present:
Mr.
Alastair Hull Court
Registrar
Ms.
Linda O'Brien Court
Reporter
A.S.A.P.
Reporting Services Inc. © 2008
200 Elgin Street, Suite 1105 130
King Street West, Suite 1800
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 1L5 Toronto,
Ontario M5X 1E3
(613) 564-2727 (416)
861-8720
Toronto, Ontario
JUSTICE BARNES: Please be seated.
These are the reasons for my decision in Carter v. the Attorney General of
Canada given orally at Toronto.
This is an application for
judicial review by Zandrina Carter challenging a decision of the Pension
Appeals Board which refused her request for leave to appeal from an earlier
decision of a Review Tribunal.
Ms. Carter claims to be
entitled to a Canada Pension disability pension, but her application for those
benefits was denied by the Review Tribunal because she did not qualify under
the rules of the disability plan.
When leave to appeal was made, it
was dismissed by the Pension Appeals Board for the same reasons as were stated
by Justice Binks and I quote:
"The appellant seeks leave to
appeal the decision of a Review Tribunal dated February 1, 2006. The
appellant's heart condition developed in the year 2000, so the appellant was
not disabled within the meaning of section 42(2) on or before her minimum
qualifying period (MQP) of December of 1995. The appellant's application is
therefore dismissed."
I can find no error in this
decision, and although I sympathize with Ms. Carter, I am required to
apply the law to the facts of her case. I am not entitled to make exceptions
to the eligibility rules because an applicant is facing financial or other
hardship.
It is for Parliament to decide if
the eligibility rules for CPP disability benefits need to be changed to account
for cases like this one.
I would, however, urge
Ms. Carter to inquire of Service Canada to see if she qualifies for a
retirement benefit which may assist her financially.
Unfortunately, Ms. Carter, I
cannot give you any relief today, and I am required to dismiss your
application.
The Crown is not seeking costs and
no order for costs will be made.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I have, to
the best
of my skill and ability,
accurately recorded
by Shorthand and transcribed
therefrom,
the foregoing proceeding.
Linda O’Brien, Computer-Aided
Transcription
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: T-791-07
STYLE OF CAUSE: Carter
v.
AGC
PLACE OF
HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF
HEARING: September
15, 2008
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
AND JUDGMENT
BY: Mr. Justice Barnes
DATED: September
18, 2008
APPEARANCES:
|
Ms. Zandrina
Carter
(905) 823-6604
|
SELF-REPRESENTED
|
|
Ms. Sandra
Gruescu
(613) 946-7693
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD:
|
Zandrina
Carter
Mississauga, Ontario
|
SELF-REPRESENTED
|
|
John H. Sims,
Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|