Date:
20121207
Docket: IMM-8457-11
Citation:
2012 FC 1446
Ottawa, Ontario,
December 7, 2012
PRESENT: The
Honourable Mr. Justice Barnes
BETWEEN:
|
|
DMYTRO AFANASYEV
|
|
|
|
Applicant
|
|
and
|
|
|
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION
|
|
|
|
Respondent
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS
FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT
[1]
In
my decision of October 31, 2012, I invited counsel for the Applicant to propose
a certified question. He submitted the following:
Do locally engaged Immigration Officers meet the
requirement of being a specialized administrative tribunal as contemplated by
the Supreme Court of Canada and if not must a reviewing Court apply a
heightened level of scrutiny due to this lack of specialized expertise?
[2]
Counsel
for the Respondent opposes this request saying that there is no basis in law to
impose the correctness standard of review on an administrative decision of
mixed fact and law. He also makes the point that the issue raised would not be
determinative because the decision was both correct and reasonable. I agree
with this position. The standard of review that applies to this type of
decision is not an issue of legal controversy. Numerous authorities from the
Supreme Court of Canada on down have consistently held that administrative
decision-makers, whatever their level of expertise, are entitled to deference
on judicial review with respect to issues of fact and mixed fact and law.
Deference is extended by applying the reasonableness standard of review. My
decision also endorsed the Officer’s finding in terms of its legal component.
I agree with the Respondent that the proposed question, however answered, would
not change the outcome and is not, therefore, determinative.
[3]
In
the result, no question will be certified.
JUDGMENT
THIS
COURT’S JUDGMENT is that no question will be certified in
connection with the decision rendered on October 31, 2012.
"R.L.
Barnes"
FEDERAL COURT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-8457-11
STYLE OF CAUSE: AFANASYEV
v MCI
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, ON
DATE OF HEARING: October
1, 2012
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT: BARNES J.
DATED: December
7, 2012
APPEARANCES:
|
Gary Segal
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
Gregory George
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
|
Rekai LLP
Toronto, ON
|
FOR THE APPLICANT
|
|
Myles
J. Kirvan
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
Toronto, ON
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|