Date: 19991209
Docket: IMM-775-99
BETWEEN:
NATARAJAN RAVI RAJ
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,
on Thursday, December 9, 1999)
McGILLIS J.
[1] Despite the able argument of counsel for the applicant, I have not been persuaded that the visa officer erred in assessing the applicant in his intended occupation of Advertising and Marketing Consultant, National Occupational Classification Code 1122.2, or in the occupation of Sales and Marketing Manager, National Occupational Code 0611.1. In my opinion, the decision of the visa officer is amply supported by the evidence in the record. In the circumstances, her decision is reasonable and my intervention in this matter is not warranted.
[2] The application for judicial review is dismissed. Counsel for the applicant requested to have an opportunity to make written submissions on the question of whether the case raises a serious question of general importance. Counsel for the applicant shall serve and file his written submissions by no later than 3 p.m. today. Counsel for the respondent shall serve and file her written submissions by no later than 5 p.m. today.
"D. McGillis"
Judge
Toronto, Ontario
December 9, 1999
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
| STYLE OF CAUSE: NATARAJAN RAVI RAJ |
Applicant
| THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION |
Respondent
| DATE OF HEARING: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1999 |
| PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO |
| REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: McGILLIS J. |
DATED: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1999
| APPEARANCES: Mr. Max Chaudhary |
| SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Max Chaudhary |
Barrister & Solicitor
255 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 812
North York, Ontario
M3B 3H9
Morris Rosenberg
| Deputy Attorney General of Canada |
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date: 19991209
Docket: IMM-775-99
BETWEEN:
NATARAJAN RAVI RAJ
Applicant
| THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Email this Content