Date: 20020731
Dockets: T-824-02 and T-1150-02
Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 831
Montréal, Quebec, July 31, 2002
Present: The Honourable Mr. Justice Lemieux
Docket: T-824-02
BETWEEN:
LOUISE BONSPILLE AND BRENDA ETIENNE
Applicants
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE,
JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
Respondents
Docket: T-1150-02
BETWEEN:
LOUISE BONSPILLE, BRENDA ETIENNE,
CATHERINE BEAUVAIS and GABRIELLE LAMOUCHE-TOMLINSON
Applicants
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE, JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
Respondents
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
[1] I authorize the Attorney General of Quebec to intervene in these two cases with all the rights of a party. I am of the opinion that his application fulfills the requirements of section 109 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 and the cases, in particular Canadian Union of Public Employees (Airline Division) v. Canadian Airlines International Limited, [2000] F.C.J. No. 220.
[2] The backdrop to both of these applications for judicial review is the tripartite agreement signed by the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake, the Government of Quebec and the Government of Canada concerning the setting up of a Kanesatake Mohawk police force (the tripartite agreement). The principle at issue is the independence of the Comité de sécurité publique de Kanesatake and the Mohawk police force of Kanesatake.
[3] This Court will be interpreting the tripartite agreement, and this is cause for the Attorney General of Quebec to be heard and to make submissions on all questions of fact and of law.
"François Lemieux"
Judge
Certified true translation
Suzanne M. Gauthier, C. Tr., LL.L
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
Date: 20020731
Dockets: T-824-02 and T-1150-02
Docket: T-824-02
BETWEEN:
LOUISE BONSPILLE AND BRENDA ETIENNE
Applicants
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE,
JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
Respondents
Docket: T-1150-02
BETWEEN:
LOUISE BONSPILLE, BRENDA ETIENNE,
CATHERINE BEAUVAIS and
GABRIELLE LAMOUCHE-TOMLINSON
Applicants
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE, JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
Respondents
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
TRIAL DIVISION
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKETS: T-824-02 and T-1150-02
Docket: T-824-02
STYLE: LOUISE BONSPILLE AND BRENDA ETIENNE
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE,
JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
Docket: T-1150-02
STYLE: LOUISE BONSPILLE, BRENDA ETIENNE,
CATHERINE BEAUVAIS and GABRIELLE LAMOUCHE-TOMLINSON
and
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE,
MAVIS KATSI'TSEN:HAWE ÉTIENNE, JOCELYN BONSPILLE,
KANERAHTENHA:WI HILDA NICHOLAS and
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
for The Solicitor General of Canada
WRITTEN MOTION EXAMINED WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER
AND ORDER: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LEMIEUX
DATED: July 31, 2002
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS:
Peter Annis
FOR THE APPLICANTS
Martin W. Mason
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE
ET AL.
Annick Pelletier
FOR THE RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
René Bourassa
Mario Normandin
FOR THE INTERVENER
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC
Vincent Dagenais Gibson
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANTS
Gowling Lafleur Henderson
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENTS
MOHAWK COUNCIL OF KANESATAKE
ET AL.
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Bernard, Roy & Associates
Department of Justice of Quebec
Litigation Division, Attorney General of Quebec
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE INTERVENER
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF QUEBEC
Email this Content