Date: 20000607
Docket: IMM-2522-99
BETWEEN:
KARAM SINGH RAJPUT
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
REED J. (orally)
[1] There is no merit to this application. The visa officer gave the applicant full points in experience even though she doubted the validity of his documentation. She gave him four points for personal suitability - even if she had given him the full 10 points, he would not have obtained the required 70 points. Her questioning of him about his language ability and his immigration status, are not examples of bias but questioning with respect to false statements he had made. Her questioning of him about his failure to attend earlier scheduled interviews does not demonstrate bias. The applicant was not truthful in his application. There was no bias on the part of the visa officer.
ORDER
[2] The application is therefore dismissed.
"B. Reed"
J.F.C.C.
Toronto, Ontario
June 7, 2000
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
| STYLE OF CAUSE: KARAM SINGH RAJPUT |
- and -
| THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION |
| DATE OF HEARING: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7, 2000 |
| PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO |
REASONS FOR ORDER
DATED: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 7, 2000
| APPEARANCES: Mr. M. Max Chaudhary |
Ms. Andrea Horton
| SOLICITORS OF RECORD: CHAUDHARY LAW OFFICE |
255 Duncan Mill Road
Suite 405
North York, Ontario
M3B 3H9
| Deputy Attorney General of Canada |
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date: 20000607
Docket: IMM-2522-99
Between:
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
Email this Content