Docket: IMM-2707-03
Neutral citation: 2004 FC 1123
BETWEEN:
ZSOLT KURUCSAI
Applicant
and
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
PHELAN J.
Introduction
[1] Mr. Kurucsai, a citizen of Hungary and a person of Roma ethnicity, sought refugee and person in need of protection status on the grounds of fear of organized criminal activity in Hungary. A member of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the Panel) denied the application because his story was not credible and because state protection exists for Mr. Kurucsai.
Background
[2] Mr. Kurucsai's story is long, involved and confusing. In essence he states that members of organized crime have kidnapped, beaten, threatened, stabbed, and robbed him. He says that the police were unresponsive.
[3] The Panel noted that Mr. Kurucsai's oral evidence was at odds with his PIF on some material facts. With respect to a pivotal event, his kidnapping, stabbing and robbery at a gas station, he gave directly contradictory evidence as to the reasons for being at the particular location.
[4] The Panel found it difficult to believe that Mr. Kurucsai did not know how much money he had lost as a result of all of his various encounters with members of organized crime. The Panel did not believe that a business person, who could provide complete details of complex automobile transactions and who had been involved in a three year robbery investigation, did not know this type of basic information.
[5] The Panel could not accept the story that, following Mr. Kurucsai's kidnapping and after he was stabbed in the stomach (an injury for which he did not seek medical attention), the kidnappers took him to a restaurant where they offered him a meal.
[6] There are other incidents which the Panel could not accept as true including, the kidnappers giving Mr. Kurucsai a car and money; the kidnappers appearing in a court room and, in the presence of lawyers and police, making threats to him; or his excuse for not leaving Hungary earlier.
[7] On the issue of state protection, the Panel held Mr. Kurucsai had not rebutted the presumption of state protection. Mr. Kurucsai had received police assistance; what he wanted was 24 hour protection. Despite Mr. Kurucsai's unreasonable expectations, documentary evidence and his own testimony showed that state protection, while not perfect, was available generally and was made available to him in particular.
Analysis
[8] It is readily accepted that the standard of review in regard to credibility findings is patent unreasonableness.
[9] The Panel's credibility findings were specifically linked to either inconsistencies in history or to implausibility based upon experience and common sense. Therefore, the findings fall within the Panel's mandate and expertise, to which a high degree of deference is owed.
[10] There is nothing unreasonable, much less patently unreasonable, in the Panel's conclusions on credibility.
[11] The same can be said about the Panel's treatment of documents produced by Mr. Kurucsai. The Panel found that his own allegations contradicted these documents and therefore it gave the documents little weight. This is a rational conclusion which this Court will not second-guess.
[12] The issue of state protection was only raised. The Panel had reviewed the country condition reports, noted the portions which assisted the applicant but had concluded that, on balance, Hungary is able to handle the problems of organized crime and has committed the resources to do so. There is no basis for overturning these conclusions.
[13] The Panel also addressed Mr. Kurucsai's own evidence which confirmed that police responded to his complaints, and that he had developed a good relationship with one of the detectives who was particularly helpful.
[14] There is no basis for attacking the finding of state protection.
[15] For these reasons this judicial review will be dismissed.
[16] There is no question to be certified.
(s) "Michael L. Phelan"
Judge
FEDERAL COURT
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: IMM-2707-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: ZSOLT KURUCSAI v. MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: June 16, 2004
REASONS FOR ORDER: The Honourable Mr. Justice Phelan
DATED: August 12, 2004
APPEARANCES:
Mr. Peter G. Ivanyi FOR THE APPLICANT
Ms. A. Leena Jaakkimainen FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS ON THE RECORD:
Rochon Genova
Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT
Mr. Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE RESPONDENT
Email this Content