Date:
20051117
Docket:
T-1670-04
Citation:
2005 FC 1556
Montréal, Quebec, November 17, 2005
Present: Richard
Morneau, Prothonotary
BETWEEN:
YVON
DROLET
Plaintiff/
Defendant
to counterclaim
and
STIFTUNG
GRALSBOTSCHAFT
FOUNDATION
OF THE GRAIL MOVEMENT - CANADA
Defendants/
Plaintiffs
by counterclaim
REASONS
FOR ORDER AND ORDER
[1]
UPON MOTION, that is, a motion in writing by the plaintiff/defendant to
counterclaim (the plaintiff) for:
- dismissal of the defence and counterclaim by the
defendants/plaintiffs by counterclaim parties (the defendants); and
- in the alternative, for security for costs and the filing of
undertakings against the defendants (sections 3, 5, 34, 47, 96 and 97,
paragraph 221(1)(d), section 359 and paragraph 400(3)(i) of the Federal
Courts Rules (the Rules).
[2]
WHEREAS, since filing of the aforesaid motion, the plaintiff has
withdrawn conclusions A and H of his notice of motion and thus the Court need
not address them;
[3]
After having read and considered the records produced by the parties in
this motion by the plaintiff, in light of section 3 of the Rules, the Court
disposes of this motion as follows:
(a) Within thirty (30) days of these Reasons for Order and Order,
the defendants shall deliver to the plaintiff an affidavit by Mr. Thivierge in
which Mr. Thivierge shall respond more fully and in greater detail to the
following requests for undertaking: 6, 27, 28 and the “unnumbered one.”
(b) Furthermore, the Court is satisfied that the defendants have
responded adequately to requests for undertaking 2 and 38 and have taken a
reasonable position with respect to requests for undertaking 3, 13, 35 and 36;
( c) The examination for discovery of Mr. Thivierge, as the
defendants’ representative, shall continue if necessary at his expense, on the
sole basis of the replies contained in his affidavit, on a date to be agreed
upon between the parties or, if no such agreement is reached, on the date
falling fifteen (15) days after the plaintiff receives service of the affidavit
referred to at point (a) above.
[4]
There is no reason to allow costs on this motion, given its mixed
success and the Court’s perception that both parties in turn attempted to take
undue advantage of their position either to demand replies too quickly or to
delay the filing of replies to the requests for undertakings.
[5]
For greater certainty, the plaintiff’s motion is otherwise dismissed.
|
|
“Richard
Morneau”
|
|
|
Prothonotary
|
Certified true translation
Michael Palles
FEDERAL
COURT
SOLICITORS
OF RECORD
DOCKET:
STYLE OF CAUSE:
T-1670-04
YVON DROLET
Plaintiff/
Defendant
to counterclaim
and
STIFTUNG GRALSBOTSCHAFT
FOUNDATION OF THE GRAIL MOVEMENT
- CANADA
Defendants/
Plaintiffs
by counterclaim
MOTION IN WRITING CONSIDERED
AT MONTRÉAL WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF THE PARTIES
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: RICHARD MORNEAU,
PROTHONOTARY
DATED: November
17, 2005
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BY:
|
Jean-Faustin Badimboli
|
|
for the Plaintiff/Defendant to
counterclaim
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pascal Lauzon
|
|
for the Defendants/Plaintiffs
by counterclaim
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dagenais & Associés
Montréal, Quebec
|
|
for the Plaintiff/Defendant to
Counterclaim
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCF s.e.n.c.r.l.
Montréal, Quebec
|
|
for the Defendants/Plaintiffs
by Counterclaim
|
|
|
|
|