Date: 19980212
Docket: T-2318-96
IN THE MATTER OF the Citizenship Act,
R.S.C., 1985, c. C-29.
AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal from the
decision of a Citizenship Judge
AND IN THE MATTER OF
FANTU DERESSA,
Appellant.
REASONS FOR ORDER
JOYAL, J.
[1] These are brief reasons for my Order of November 26, 1997, wherein I allowed the appellant's appeal from an unfavourable decision of a Citizenship Judge, and I granted her Canadian citizenship.
[2] The grounds for the Citizenship Judge denying the appellant's application for Canadian citizenship was that the appellant had failed to meet the knowledge test set out in paragraph 5(1)(e) of the Citizenship Act, i.e. knowledge of Canada and of the responsibilities and privileges of Canadian citizenship.
[3] An appeal from such a decision to the Federal Court is in essence a trial de novo. As happens frequently, the failure of an applicant under paragraph 5(1)(e) is a good stimulus to try harder so as to succeed the next time around. Such was the case with the appellant herein. After lengthy and extensive questioning by the amicus curiae, she was indeed able to establish that her current knowledge of matters as covered by the statute was now sufficient to warrant the granting of Canadian citizenship to her.
[4] This, the Court is pleased to do. The appellant's appeal is therefore allowed and the Court declares that she is hereby entitled to Canadian citizenship.
L-Marcel Joyal
J U D G E
O T T A W A, Ontario
February 12, 1998.
Email this Content