Date: 19990125
Docket: 97-1310-IT-G
BETWEEN:
NICOLAS STILIADIS,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Appeal heard on January 14, 1999, at Toronto, Ontario, by the
Honourable Judge D. Hamlyn
Reasons for judgment
Hamlyn, J.T.C.C.
[1] This appeal is in respect of the Appellant's 1993 pre
and post-bankruptcy taxation years.
FACTS
[2] On October 15, 1992, the Appellant was petitioned
into bankruptcy.
[3] On April 14, 1993, a receiving order was issued
against the Appellant with respect to the petition for bankruptcy
made against him on October 15, 1992.
[4] In October 1993, the Appellant's appeal from the
receiving order issued against him was dismissed.
[5] The date of the Appellant's bankruptcy was
April 14, 1993.
[6] During 1993, the Appellant carried on business and was
self-employed.
[7] The fiscal year end for the Appellant's business was
December 31.
[8] During the period January 1, 1993 to March 31,
1993, the Appellant deposited into a bank account the amount of
$56,647 as income from business.
[9] During the period April 16, 1993 to August 31,
1993, the Appellant deposited into a bank account the amount of
$21,854 as income from business.
[10] During the period September 1, 1993 until
December 31, 1993, the Appellant deposited into a bank
account the amount of $260 as income from business.
[11] The Appellant failed to file his return of income for his
1993 taxation year as and when required by sections 128 and
150 of the Income Tax Act (the
"Act").
[12] The Minister of National Revenue (the
"Minister") assessed the Appellant under
subsection 152(7) of the Act, notice thereof dated
January 26, 1995, to include in income the amount of
$80,000.
[13] The Appellant served on the Minister a Notice of
Objection to the assessment of his 1993 taxation year, which
notice was dated March 20, 1995.
[14] With his Notice of Objection, the Appellant filed an
income tax return for his 1993 taxation year whereby he reported
gross business income of $21,854.33 and net business income of
$14,132.03 from his business as film producer.
[15] The assessment of the Appellant's 1993 taxation year
was confirmed by the Minister, notice thereof dated
January 31, 1997.
ISSUE
[16] The issue to be decided is whether the Appellant is
liable to pay income tax on the income earned by him from his
business as film producer during the whole of the period of that
business, being January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993,
or whether the Appellant is only liable to pay income tax on the
income earned by him from his business as film producer earned by
him during his first post-bankruptcy taxation year being the
period April 15, 1993 to December 31, 1993.
THE APPELLANT'S ARGUMENT
[17] The liability accruing with respect to his income tax
obligations as a self-employed person to the date of his
bankruptcy was a claim provable in bankruptcy within
subsection 121(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency
Act (the "Bankruptcy Act") and as such was
stayed by subsection 69(1) of the Bankruptcy Act.
[18] The fact that the final amount of his earnings could not
have been determined until the end of the 1993 calendar year did
not remove his income tax liability as a self-employed person to
the date of his bankruptcy from the realm of being a claim
provable in bankruptcy.
[19] His liability to pay income tax arose at the time he
earned income notwithstanding that the requirement to pay to the
Receiver General the amount of income tax came into existence at
a later date.
[20] Even if his income tax liability as a self-employed
person to the date of his bankruptcy was not a 'present
liability' within subsection 121(1) of the Bankruptcy
Act because the final amount of his earnings could not have
been determined until the end of the calendar year, it was
nonetheless a 'future liability' within
subsection 121(1) of the Bankruptcy Act and was
therefore a claim provable in bankruptcy.
[21] If subsections 69(1) and 121(1) and section 178
of the Bankruptcy Act cannot be reconciled with
subsection 11(1) and paragraphs 128(2)(d) and
(f) of the Act, applying the maxim generalia
specialibus non derogant, the provisions of the Bankruptcy
Act override and ought not to be interfered by those of the
Act.
THE RESPONDENT'S ARGUMENT
[22] Subsection 121(1) of the Bankruptcy Act
defines claims provable in bankruptcy as "[a]ll debts and
liabilities, present or future, to which the bankrupt is subject
on the day on which the bankrupt becomes bankrupt or to which the
bankrupt may become subject before the bankrupt's discharge
by reason of any obligation incurred before the day on which the
bankrupt becomes bankrupt shall be deemed to be claims provable
in proceedings under this Act.
[23] As the Appellant's taxable income from his business
cannot be ascertained until the end of his fiscal period being
December 31, 1993, his estimate of tax as reported on his
return of income for the first post-bankruptcy taxation year (and
ultimately his tax payable as fixed by assessment) also cannot be
ascertained until the end of his fiscal period. As such, any tax
payable by the Appellant on his taxable income from his business
as a film producer is not a claim provable under the
Bankruptcy Act within the meaning of that term as defined
by the Bankruptcy Act.
LEGISLATION
[24] The purpose of the Bankruptcy Act is to permit
debtors (bankrupts) to obtain a discharge from debts subject to
reasonable conditions and to provide for the orderly distribution
of property of a bankrupt owing creditors on a prescribed
basis.[1]
[25] The legislative purpose also ensures that all property
owned by the bankrupt at the date of bankruptcy vests in the
trustee for realisation by him and distribution to creditors.[2]
[26] The legislation provides all debts and liabilities to
which the bankrupt is subject at the date of bankruptcy or may be
subject before discharge shall be claims provable in
bankruptcy.[3]
[27] Subsection 69(1) of the Bankruptcy Act stays
all claims provable in bankruptcy upon the bankruptcy of the
debtor.
[28] Subsection 178(1) of the Bankruptcy Act lists
certain debts of a bankrupt not released by order of discharge.
Subsection 178(2) provides, subject to subsection (1),
an order of discharge releases the bankrupt from all claims
provable in bankruptcy.
[29] In a current year upon bankruptcy for individuals the
taxation year comes to an end on the day before the bankruptcy
and a new taxation year begins on the day of the bankruptcy and
ends on December 31 of that year.[4]
[30] Income tax is payable upon taxable income for each
taxation year. Taxable income of a taxpayer's income for a
taxation year is the taxpayer's income for the year computed
in accordance with the Act.[5]
[31] The taxation year for an individual is the calendar
year.[6]
[32] Where an individual is a sole proprietor of a business,
the individual's income from that business is deemed to be
the individual's income from the business for the fiscal
periods of the business that ended in that year.[7]
ANALYSIS
[33] The liability to pay income tax arises by operation of
the Act.
[34] Taxpayers' tax liability is determined by reference
to taxpayers' taxable income.
[35] Income tax is payable upon taxable income for each
taxation year. Income tax liability arises when the taxpayer has
taxable income in a taxation year and is an ongoing liability.[8]
[36] Where a taxpayer is a proprietor of a business, the
individual's income from the business for a taxation year is
deemed to be the individual's income from the business for
the fiscal periods of the business that ended in that taxation
year.
[37] A bankrupt individual's taxation year in a calendar
year however is treated uniquely. There are two taxation years.
Upon bankruptcy the current taxation year comes to an end and a
new taxation year begins.
[38] By fixing a date that defines two taxation years in the
same calendar year (pre-bankruptcy and post-bankruptcy) the
Act recognises the changed status of the bankrupt.
[39] Upon bankruptcy, the bankrupt's property vests in the
trustee in bankruptcy. In reality, this in and of itself brings
the actual fiscal year to an end. All debts are subject to claims
provable in bankruptcy. Subsection 69(1) of the Bankruptcy
Act stays all claims provable in bankruptcy.
CONCLUSION
[40] I conclude income tax liability for the Appellant for the
period between January 1, 1993 and April 13, 1993, is a
present claim provable in bankruptcy. The computation of tax
payable for this Appellant after the bankruptcy does not affect
the liability that arose and attaches before the bankruptcy.
DECISION
[41] The appeal is allowed and the assessment is referred back
to the Minister on the basis that the combined operation of the
Income Tax Act and the Bankruptcy and Insolvency
Act, the Appellant's liability to pay tax on income
earned (a present claim provable in bankruptcy) between
January 1, 1993 and April 13, 1993, is stayed.
[42] The Appellant is entitled to his costs on a party and
party basis.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 25th day of January 1999.
"D. Hamlyn"
J.T.C.C.