Date: 20010703
Docket: 2001-1-IT-I
BETWEEN:
FITZMAURICE BROTHERS CUSTOM CARPENTRY INC.,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Supplement Reasons for Judgment
Teskey, J.
[1]
At the conclusion of this appeal I gave reasons from the bench.
In these reasons I said that the reason I was allowing these
appeals was because neither Douglas nor David had seen their
personal tax returns.
[2]
On reflection, I realize that this only holds truth for the 1995
taxation year. Since Douglas and David ought to have found the
errors in April of 1996 when completing their 1995 T1 tax
returns, their gross negligence led to the corporation tax
returns for the taxation year October 31, 1996 when prepared
after that date to also be incorrect.
[3]
For these supplementary reasons the penalties for the 1996
assessment will not be removed.
[4]
The appeal is allowed, without costs, and the assessments made
under the Income Tax Act for the 1995 and 1996 taxation
years are referred back to the Minister of National Revenue for
reconsideration and reassessment, on the following basis:
For 1995, all penalties are to be deleted and the Appellant is to
be allowed a further deduction for wages of $1,650.
For 1996, the Appellant is to be allowed a further deduction for
wages of $26,600 and the penalties to be recalculated on the
revised taxable income.
[5]
The Appellant is not entitled to any further relief.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada this 3rd day of July, 2001.
"Gordon Teskey"
J.T.C.C.
COURT FILE
NO.:
2001-1(IT)I
STYLE OF
CAUSE:
Fitzmaurice Brothers Custom Carpentry Inc.
and Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF
HEARING:
Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF
HEARING:
June 19, 2001
REASONS FOR SUPPLEMENT
JUDGMENT
BY:
The Hon. Judge Gordon Teskey
DATE OF
JUDGMENT:
July 3rd, 2001
APPEARANCES:
Agent for the
Appellant:
Richard Onley
Counsel for the
Respondent:
Suzanne Bruce
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the
Appellant:
For the
Respondent:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada
2001-1(IT)I
BETWEEN:
FITZMAURICE BROTHERS
CUSTOM CARPENTRY INC.,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Appeals heard together with the appeals of
David Fitzmaurice
(2001-2(IT)I) and Douglas Fitzmaurice
(2001-3(IT)I)
on June 19, 2001 at Toronto, Ontario by
the Honourable Judge Gordon Teskey
Appearances
Agent for the
Appellant:
Richard Onley
Counsel for the
Respondent:
Suzanne Bruce
JUDGMENT
The
appeals from the assessments made under the Income Tax Act
for the 1995 and 1996 taxation years are allowed without costs,
and the assessment is referred back to the Minister of National
Revenue for reconsideration and reassessment, on the following
basis:
For
1995 all penalties are to be deleted and the Appellant is to be
allowed a further deductions for wages of $1,650.
For
1996 the Appellant is to be allowed a further deductions for
wages of $26,600. and the penalties to be recalculated on the
revised taxable income.
The
Appellant is not entitled to any further relief.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 3rd day of July, 2001
J.T.C.C.