|
Docket: 2002-1725(IT)I
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
MANON LUCIE ALLARD,
|
|
Appellant,
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
|
Respondent.
|
[OFFICIAL ENGLISH
TRANSLATION]
I request that the Reasons for
Judgment delivered at the hearing at the Tax Court of Canada, 500 Place
d'Armes, Montréal, Quebec, on February
12, 2003, and revised on April 3, 2003, be filed.
Signed
at Ottawa, Canada, this 3rd day of April
2003.
J.T.C.C.
Translation
certified true
on this 25th day of
May 2004.
Sophie Debbané,
Revisor
|
Citation: 2003TCC192
|
|
Date: 20030403
|
|
Docket: 2002-1725(IT)I
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
MANON LUCIE ALLARD,
|
|
Appellant,
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
|
Respondent.
|
[OFFICIAL ENGLISH
TRANSLATION]
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(delivered orally from
the bench
on February 12, 2003,
at Montréal, Quebec,
and revised on April
3, 2003)
P.R. Dussault, J.T.C.C.
[1] I
am going to allow the appeal for March 2001. There are indications that Marc Allard still
had the same address, even in May, that is, two months later. The evidence is
in fact conflicting; there is no doubt that someone is lying. I am not going to
spend two weeks wondering which one is lying. I think that the appellant
testified; her testimony is supported by that of her son, who nonetheless
acknowledged that he had made an earlier statement to the contrary. He said he
had made that statement not because he was forced to do so but because he felt
forced to do so. He went back on that statement and now says that, beginning on
December 23, 2000, he was living primarily at the appellant’s house and took
his meals primarily at her house. For this reason, and given that only the
month of March 2001 is at issue, I accept the testimony of the appellant and
that of her son.
[2] As
for Mr.
Desrochers, his memory is short for some things and long for others. It seems
to me that a person ought to remember if he was sued as a father for payment of
support. Furthermore, when a person categorically states that on a number of
occasions that person bought clothes for a child, that person should, at a
minimum, remember one piece or item that he or she may have bought, even if
that person does not remember the price.
[3] The appeal is allowed.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada,
this 3rd day of April 2003.
J.T.C.C.
Translation
certified true
on this 25th day of
May 2004.
Sophie Debbané, Revisor