|
Citation: 2004TCC423
Date: 20040614
Docket: 2003-3833(IT)I
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
BETTY HIGGINBOTTOM,
|
|
Appellant,
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
|
Respondent.
|
____________________________________________________________________
Appeal called for hearing on June 1, 2004 at
Kamloops, British Columbia
|
Before: The Honourable Justice D.W. Beaubier
|
|
|
|
Appearances:
|
|
|
|
For the Appellant:
|
No one appeared
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Shawna Cruz
|
____________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT AND REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Upon reviewing the file and the Appellant's application
for a second adjournment of this appeal on May 31, 2004, the
Court notes:
[1] This matter was set for hearing at
Kamloops, British Columbia for February 6, 2004. The Appellant
applied for an adjournment on February 2, 2004 on the following
grounds - Illness as stated without a doctor's certificate.
The adjournment was granted.
[2] Before this matter was again set
for hearing, the Hearings Coordinator contacted the Appellant on
April 16, 2004, to agree on a suitable date. The Appellant agreed
to June 1, 2004 at Kamloops, British Columbia and set the time
for hearing at 1:30 p.m. to allow her to travel from Merritt to
Kamloops, a one-hour drive on a divided four-lane highway.
[3] The May 31, 2004 request for
adjournment by the Appellant contained the following grounds:
(a) Bowel problem and other
medical complaints respecting which, in the circumstances of this
request and the subject of the appeal, require an acceptable
medical certificate.
(b) No reliable transportation which
is not acceptable in view of the Appellant's direction as to
the date and time of hearing in her telephone conversation of
April 16, 2004 with the Hearings Coordinator.
(c) Lack of a lawyer which again is
unacceptable in view of her directions of April 16, 2004 to the
Hearings Coordinator, and the time that has passed since then in
which she could have obtained a lawyer.
[4] As a result of the foregoing, the
Court denied the application for adjournment on May 31, 2004 and
the denial was communicated to the Appellant on that day.
[5] On June 1, 2004, this appeal was
called for hearing at 1:30 p.m. at the courthouse in Kamloops,
British Columbia as agreed to and directed by the Appellant to
this Court. The Appellant did not appear.
[6] The matter was adjourned until
2:00 p.m.
[7] At 2:00 p.m. this appeal was
called for hearing a second time, pursuant to the Tax Court of
Canada Rules. The Appellant did not appear. Crown counsel
thereupon moved that the appeal be dismissed for want of
prosecution.
[8] For the foregoing reasons, the
appeal is dismissed.
Signed at Calgary, Alberta, this 14th day of June 2004.
Beaubier, J.