|
Docket: 2004-1247(IT)I
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
DANY BEAULIEU,
|
|
Appellant,
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
|
Respondent.
|
____________________________________________________________________
Appeal heard on August 31, 2004, at Matane, Quebec.
|
Before: The
Honourable Justice Alain Tardif
|
|
|
|
Appearances:
|
|
|
|
Agent for the
Appellant:
|
Rino Caron
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the
Respondent:
|
Marie-Claude
Landry
|
____________________________________________________________________
JUDGMENT
The
appeal from the assessments made pursuant to the Income Tax Act for the
2000, 2001 and 2002 taxation years is dismissed and the Court orders that the
$100 filing fee paid by the Appellant for his appeal be reimbursed to him.
Signed at Ottawa,
Canada, this 7th day of September 2004.
Tardif
J.
Translation certified
true
on this 30th day of
March 2009.
Bella
Lewkowicz, Translator
|
Citation: 2004TCC602
|
|
Date: 20040907
|
|
Docket: 2004-1247(IT)I
|
|
BETWEEN:
|
|
DANY BEAULIEU,
|
|
Appellant,
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
|
|
Respondent.
|
|
[OFFICIAL
ENGLISH TRANSLATION]
|
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Tardif J.
[1] This is an appeal pursuant to the Income Tax Act regarding
the 2000, 2001 and 2002 taxation years.
[2] The agent for the Appellant, Rino Caron, a
training management auditor, indicated at the beginning of the hearing that the
merits of the assessments were not in dispute and he was only contesting the
fact that the Appellant’s employer gave him the Claim for Meals and Lodging
Expenses (TL2) form when the employer did not have the right to use it or to
provide it to employees, including the Appellant, as the employer’s commercial
and industrial activities do not allow for its use.
[3] I then informed the Appellant and his agent that my jurisdiction
was limited to ruling on the merits of the assessments pursuant to the
provisions of the Income Tax Act.
[4] Given that the agent for the Appellant acknowledged that the
assessments were made pursuant to paragraphs 8(1)(g) and 8(1)(h),
subsections 8(2) and 8(4) and section 67.1 of the Income Tax Act, I have
no choice but to dismiss the appeal.
[5] With respect to the circumstances of this docket, the Court orders
that the $100 filing fee paid by the Appellant when filing his appeal be
reimbursed.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 7th day of
September 2004.
Tardif
J.
Translation certified
true
on this 30th day of
March 2009.
Bella Lewkowicz, Translator
|
COURT FILE NO.:
|
2004-1247(IT)I
|
|
STYLE OF CAUSE:
|
Dany Beaulieu v.
Her Majesty the Queen
|
|
PLACE OF
HEARING:
|
Matane, Quebec
|
|
DATE OF HEARING:
|
August 31, 2004
|
|
REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT BY:
|
The Honourable
Justice Alain Tardif
|
|
DATE OF
JUDGMENT:
|
September 7,
2004
|
|
Agent for the
Appellant:
|
Rino Caron
|
|
Counsel for the
Respondent:
|
Marie-Claude
Landry
|
|
For the
Appellant:
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Respondent:
|
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney
General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada
|