Citation: 2009TCC389
Date: 20090806
Docket: 2005-1759(IT)G
BETWEEN:
LESLIE JOSEPH STANKOWSKI,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR TAXATION
Barbara Tanasychuk, T.O., T.C.C.
[1] This taxation came on for hearing by way of a
telephone conference call on June 24, 2009. It follows a Judgment of the
Honourable Madam Justice Judith Woods of this Court dated March 11, 2008, in
which the appeal with respect to an assessment made under the Income Tax Act
was dismissed, with costs. The Appellant represented himself and Mr. Shatru
Ghan represented the Respondent.
[2] The Bill of Costs filed on October
24, 2008, is as follows:
1.(1) Services of
Counsel:
1(1)(a) For all services in a
proceeding prior to an Examination $525.00
for Discovery
1(1)(b) For a discovery of
documents or inspection of property $150.00
1(1)(c) For Examination for
Discovery held on January 26, 2007 $525.00
1(1)(e) For preparation for and
attendance at a show cause hearing $125.00
held on November 30,
2007
For preparation for and
attendance at a show cause hearing $125.00
held on September 7,
2007
1(1)(g) For preparation for hearing
$625.00
1(1)(h) For conduct of the hearing
for each day or part thereof $1,500.00
(at $1,500.00 per day),
held on March 10, 2008
1(1)(i) For all services after
judgment $300.00
TOTAL FEES:
$3,875.00
1.(2) Disbursements:
Discovery Transcripts:
$267.65
MHFFeltman Verbatim
Reporting
Photocopying:
$8.40
Reply:
4 pages x $0.20 x 4
copies = $3.20
List of Documents
(Partial Disclosure):
5 pages x $0.20 x 4
copies = $4.00
Notice to Attend: 3
pages $0.20 x 1 copy = $0.60
Joint Application: 3
pages x $0.20 x 1 copy = $0.60
Process Server: $63.60
Cancor Services – served Notice to
Attend and
Respondent’s List of Documents
(Partial Disclosure)
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS:
$339.65
TOTAL FEES AND DISBURSEMENTS:
$4,214.65
1(1)(c) For taxation of costs
$525.00
Total Fees and Disbursements: (including
taxation of $4,739.65
costs if necessary)
APPELLANT’S POSITION
[3] Mr. Stankowski’s position is that the
Respondent is not entitled to recover any amount for costs. Mr. Stankowski
referred to a letter from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), which he said set out
the amount owing to CRA, and included a statement that once payment was made,
all legal action would be removed. As the letter he referred to was not before
me, a copy of the letter was forwarded after this hearing. The letter from CRA
is dated May 30, 2008 (CRA letter) and is as follows:
Canada Revenue
Agency
Tax Services Office
Scarborough ON M1P 4Y3
May 30, 2008
Account Number
LESLIE J
STANKOWSKI 480 316 496
6193 KINGSTON RD
SCARBOROUGH ON M1C 1L1
Dear Sir:
Re: Request for Account
Status Letter for:
Leslie Joseph
Stankowski
This letter is in response to your
telephone request for your outstanding balance owing to Canada Revenue Agency
(CRA).
As of today’s date, their is a
balance owing of $85,000.00.
The above information was drawn
from Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) existing computerized records relating to
this account.
Please forward you cheque or
payment to the attention of P. Strachan at the address noted below. Write your
account number on the front of your cheque to help us process it.
All legal action taken on account
will be immediately removed once payment is posted to account.
Please call us at the number below
if you need more information.
Yours sincerely,
P. Strachan
Collections Officer
[4] Mr. Stankowski stated that he paid
the $85,000.00 referred to in the CRA letter. It is his position that he has
paid all amounts owing to CRA and the Respondent cannot now look to him for
payment of costs. Mr. Stankowski placed emphasis on the wording of the 5th
paragraph of the CRA letter, which states:
“All legal action taken on account
will be immediately removed once payment is posted to account.”
RESPONDENT’S
POSITION
[5] Mr. Ghan does not agree with Mr.
Stankowski. He stated that the CRA letter set out the balance owing by Mr.
Stankowski, which is a separate matter, unrelated to the costs awarded by the
Court, which the Respondent is entitled to.
DECISION
[6] The Judgment in this appeal was
issued on March 11, 2008. The CRA letter referred to by Mr. Stankowski is dated
May 30, 2008.
[7] The Respondent’s Bill of Costs was filed
with the Court on October 24, 2008. However, the Respondent had been corresponding
with Mr. Stankowski regarding the issue of costs, as early as June 11, 2008.
Attached as Exhibit “E” to the Affidavit of Hilda Mozaffar is a letter dated
June 11, 2008 from Mr. Ghan to Mr. Stankowski, in which the Respondent’s Bill
of Costs was enclosed and a request for payment of costs was made. No response
was received and a further letter dated July 25, 2008 (Exhibit “F” to the
Affidavit of Hilda Mozaffar) was sent to Mr. Stankowski. Mr. Ghan’s first
letter to Mr. Stankowski was sent less than two weeks after the CRA letter.
[8] The CRA letter included a statement
that “all legal action taken on account will be immediately removed once
payment is posted to account”. As Mr. Stankowski paid $85,000.00 to CRA, which
was the balance outstanding on his account, he feels that the Respondent is not
entitled to the costs awarded by the Court. I do not agree. The Court’s award
of costs in favour of the Respondent arose out of an unsuccessful appeal filed by
Mr. Stankowski. Any legal action taken by CRA to collect the balance
outstanding on Mr. Stankowski’s account is unrelated to the costs awarded by
the Court, which the Respondent is entitled to pursue.
[9] The amounts claimed for counsel fees are in
accordance with Schedule II, Tariff B of the Tax Court of Canada Rules
(General Procedure) and I allow the sum of $4,400.00, which includes $525.00
for this taxation of costs. The amount claimed for disbursements were
substantiated by an Affidavit of Disbursements of Hilda Mozaffar, sworn October
23, 2008, to which copies of invoices were attached as Exhibits. I am satisfied
that the disbursements were essential for the conduct of the proceeding. I
accordingly allow the amount of $339.65 on account of disbursements.
[10] The bill of costs is taxed and $4,739.65 is
allowed. A certificate in that amount will be issued.
Signed at Toronto, Ontario, this 6th day of August 2009.
“B.G. Tanasychuk”
Email this Content