Docket: 2009-1848(IT)I
BETWEEN:
SHAWNA SITTER,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
Before: The Honourable
Justice Steven K. D'Arcy
|
For the Appellant:
|
The Appellant herself
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Jack Warren
|
____________________________________________________________________
EDITED VERSION OF TRANSCRIPT
OF ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Let the attached edited transcript of the
Reasons for Judgment, delivered orally by conference call on March 18, 2010 at Ottawa, Canada, be filed. I have edited the transcript (certified by
the Court Reporter) for style, clarity, and accuracy. I did not make any
substantive changes.
Signed
at Ottawa, Canada, this 12th
day of May, 2010.
“S. D’Arcy”
Citation: 2010 TCC 263
Date: 20100322
Docket: 2009-1848(IT)I
BETWEEN:
SHAWNA SITTER,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent.
____________________________________________________________________
EDITED VERSION OF TRANSCRIPT
OF ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Delivered orally by
conference call
on March 18, 2010 at Ottawa, Canada)
D’Arcy J.
[1]
I will now render my oral decision.
[2]
The Appellant, Shawna Sitter, has appealed a
notice of redetermination issued in respect of the Canada Child Tax Benefit and
the Goods and Services Tax Credit received by her during the period from March
2006 to December 2007.
[3]
There was no dispute with respect to the facts.
[4]
The Appellant and Steven Sitter married in 1995.
Mr. Sitter’s two children began living with the Appellant and Mr. Sitter in
August of 2004. The Appellant and Mr. Sitter began to receive the Child Tax
Benefit and the Goods and Services Tax Credit shortly after the children began
to live with them.
[5]
The Child Tax Benefit and the Goods and Services
Tax Credit were deposited into a bank account held jointly by the Appellant and
Mr. Sitter.
[6]
In February of 2006, Mr. Sitter filed for
divorce. The Appellant continued to live in the matrimonial home until
September 2006.
[7]
The Appellant testified that Mr. Sitter became
the primary caregiver in February of 2006.
[8]
The Appellant did not realize that she was
required to notify the Canada Revenue Agency of the change in her
relationship with Mr. Sitter and the two children.
[9]
The Canadian Revenue Agency continued, after
February 2006, to deposit into the joint bank account payments in respect of
the Canada Child Tax Benefit and the Goods and Services Tax Credit.
[10]
The Appellant noted on her 2006 tax return the
change in her status and her new address. This return was filed in 2007.
[11]
It appears that once the Canada Revenue Agency
became aware of the change, it reviewed her eligibility for the Canada Child
Tax Benefit and the Goods and Services Tax Credit. It then issued a
redetermination stating that she had been overpaid amounts in respect of the
Child Tax Benefits and the Goods and Services Tax Credit.
[12]
The Appellant has appealed the redetermination.
[13]
The Appellant acknowledged during the hearing
that she was not entitled to the amounts paid to her after February 2006 in
respect of the Child Tax Benefit and the Goods and Services Tax Credit.
[14]
She noted that if possible she would have repaid
the amounts. However, she did not have access to the joint account after
September 2006.
[15]
Further, she did not become aware that the Canada
Revenue Agency was continuing to pay the amounts into the joint account until
sometime in 2007.
[16]
Pursuant to subsection 122.61(1) of the Income
Tax Act, the Child Tax Benefit can only be paid to an eligible
individual in respect of qualifying dependents.
[17]
In order for a person to be an eligible
individual, the person must be the parent of a qualified dependant who
primarily fulfils the responsibility for the care and upbringing of the
qualified dependant.
[18]
Unfortunately, in light of the fact that Mr.
Sitter, in February 2006, became the person who primarily fulfilled the
responsibility for the care and upbringing of the children, the Court cannot
help the Appellant.
[19]
The Court is bound by the wording of the Income
Tax Act.
[20]
As counsel for the Respondent noted in his
argument, the Appellant ceased to be an eligible individual in February 2006,
the month in which she ceased to be the primary caregiver for the children.
[21]
As a result, the Appellant was not entitled to receive
the Child Tax Benefit after February 2006.
[22]
Further, pursuant to section 122.5, Mr.
Sitter was also the person who was entitled, effective February 2006, to claim
the Goods and Services Tax Credit in respect of the children.
[23]
Although I understand that the Appellant did not
have access to the amounts paid in respect of the Child Tax Benefit, the
amounts were paid into the bank account provided by her to the Canada Revenue
Agency.
[24]
For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed,
without costs.
D’Arcy J.
CITATION: 2010 TCC 263
COURT FILE NO.: 2009-1848(IT)I
STYLE
OF CAUSE: SHAWNA SITTER AND
HER MAJESTY THE
QUEEN
PLACE
OF HEARING: LONDON,
ONTARIO
OTTAWA,
CANADA
DATE OF HEARING: MARCH 11, 2010
MARCH 18, 2010
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: The Honourable Justice
Steven
K. D'Arcy
DATE OF JUDGMENT: MARCH 22, 2010
APPEARANCES:
|
For the Appellant:
|
The Appellant herself
|
|
Counsel for the Respondent:
|
Jack Warren
|
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant: N/A
For the Respondent: Myles J.
Kirvan
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa,
Canada
Email this Content