Citation: 2010TCC65
Date: 20100224
Docket: 2009-3459(IT)G
BETWEEN:
PATRICK E. NICHOLLS,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
AMENDED REASONS FOR ORDER
Sheridan, J.
[1] By way of background, the Appellant represented
himself at the hearing of the Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal of his 1998 taxation year.
It was not clear from his Notice of Appeal, his evidence or his submissions in
respect of the Respondent’s motion exactly what his intentions were in filing
his appeal. After hearing from the parties, I granted the Respondent’s motion
on the basis that:
1. if the purpose of the Appellant’s
appeal was to challenge the assessment of his 1998 taxation year, it must
be dismissed because there was no tax payable in that year and there can be no appeal
from a ‘nil’ assessment; and
2. alternatively, if his appeal
was in respect of his request for a determination of loss for the 1998
taxation year, then it must be quashed for being premature as, as of the date
of this hearing, the Minister had not yet issued a Notice of Determination of
Loss in respect of the 1998 taxation year.
[2] After rendering the above decision from the Bench, I
inadvertently deferred the question of
costs to the trial judge. Having since realized this oversight, I have,
pursuant to subsection 172(1) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General
Procedure), turned my mind to the matter of costs. Notwithstanding the
Respondent’s success in this motion, taking into account the Appellant’s self‑represented
status and his financial straits, I am not satisfied that an order of costs against
the Appellant is in the best interest of justice. Accordingly, it is hereby
ordered that each party shall bear its own costs throughout.
These
Amended Reasons for Order are issued in substitution for the Reasons for Order
dated February 9, 2010.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 24th day of February, 2010.
“G. A. Sheridan”
CITATION: 2010TCC65
COURT FILE NO.: 2009-3459(IT)G
STYLE OF CAUSE: PATRICK E. NICHOLLS AND
HER
MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto,
Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: February 2, 2010
REASONS FOR ORDER
BY: The Honourable Justice G. A. Sheridan
DATE OF AMENDED
REASONS February 24, 2010
FOR ORDER:
APPEARANCES:
|
For the
Appellant:
|
The Appellant himself
|
|
Counsel for the
Respondent:
|
Iris Kingston
|
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the
Respondent: John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy
Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa,
Canada