97-3324(IT)I
BETWEEN:
OLIVER WILLOCK,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Appeal heard on October 20, 1998, at
Toronto, Ontario, by
the Honourable Deputy Judge J.F.
Somers
Appearances
For the
Appellant:
The Appellant himself
Counsel for the
Respondent: B. Sood
JUDGMENT
The appeal
from the assessment made under the Income Tax Act for the
1995 taxation year is dismissed in accordance with the attached
Reasons for Judgment.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 13th day of
November 1998.
D.J.T.C.C.
Date: 19981113
Docket: 97-3324(IT)I
BETWEEN:
OLIVER WILLOCK,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Somers, D.J.T.C.C.
[1] This appeal was
heard in Toronto, Ontario, on October 20, 1998.
[2] This is an appeal
from an assessment for the 1995 taxation year since the Appellant
failed to include interest income from a foreign source in the
amount of $18,079.00.
[3] In reassessing
the Appellant, the Minister of National Revenue (the
"Minister") made the following assumptions of fact
which were admitted, denied or ignored by the Appellant:
"(a)
at all material times, the Appellant was a full-time employee of
Toronto Hydro; (admitted)
(b)
the Board of Inland Revenue for Trinidad and Tobago submitted
certain information slips identifying payments made to the
Appellant during the 1995 taxation year; (denied)
(c)
during the 1995 taxation year, the Appellant received interest
income from foreign source in the amount of $18,079.00;
(ignored)
(d)
the Appellant failed to report interest income received from
foreign source in his income tax return for the 1995 taxation
year." (denied)
[4] The Appellant, an
assistant comptroller at Toronto Hydro Electric System, testified
that his father died leaving an estate in Trinidad; the will
appointed the Appellant and the Republic Bank Limited as
executors. In fact, the Bank attended to the execution of the
will and the distribution of the assets. The Appellant was the
residual beneficiary of the will with the final distribution made
on April 11, 1995.
[5] The Appellant had
a bank account in the Republic Bank Limited in which payments
were made. The Appellant admits that he had accumulated interest
of $5,322.00 for the taxation year 1995, which amount was not
declared. The Republic Bank Limited, in a letter dated June 6,
1997 addressed to the Appellant, stated that the figures
indicated represented the interest, rent and dividends earned on
the assets after the date of death. The Appellant maintains that
some of the figures represent part of the distribution of the
assets of the estate.
[6] The Minister
relied on a form obtained from the Government of the Republic of
Trinidad and Tobago, copy of which was produced as exhibit R-3,
indicating the interest paid to the Appellant in the 1995
taxation year.
[7] There is
contradictory evidence as to the amount of interest earned in the
1995 taxation year. The Appellant states the interest earned
amounted to $5,322.00 while the Minister assessed the amount of
$18,548.00 based on documents received from the Government of the
Republic of Trinidad and Tobago.
[8] Furthermore, the
Appellant testified that some money was derived by the
distribution of the assets of the estate. The documents from the
Government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago and a letter
from the Republic Bank Limited stated otherwise. The Appellant,
who had the burden of proof, was unable to refute the
Minister's evidence.
[9] The Minister in
reassessing the Appellant for the 1995 taxation year relied on
section 3, subsection 248(1) and paragraph 12(1)(c) of the
Income Tax Act. By virtue of section 3 of the said
Act, the income of the Appellant is determined on income
derived from inside or outside of Canada.
[10] The appeal is
dismised.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 13th day of
November 1998.
D.J.T.C.C.
COURT FILE
NO.:
97-3324(IT)I
STYLE OF
CAUSE:
Oliver Willock and Her Majesty the Queen
PLACE OF
HEARING:
Toronto, Ontario
DATE OF
HEARING:
October 20, 1998
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
the Honourable Deputy Judge J.F. Somers
DATE OF
JUDGMENT:
November 13, 1998
APPEARANCES:
For the
Appellant:
The Appellant himself
Counsel for the
Respondent: B. Sood
COUNSEL OF RECORD:
For the Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the
Respondent:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada