Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Whether an individual can claim travel expenses as eligible medical expenses for purposes of the medical expense tax credit?
Position: Question of fact.
Reasons: Wording of paragraph 118.2(2)(h).
XXXXXXXXXX
2012-043593
February 20, 2012
Dear XXXXXXXXXX :
Re: Medical Expense Tax Credit - Medical Travel Expenses
This is in response to your letter of February 2, 2012, inquiring about whether you can claim travel expenses incurred for medical reasons.
Further to the telephone conversation (Moore/XXXXXXXXXX ) of February 20, 2012, it is our understanding that you had XXXXXXXXXX surgery recently and require physiotherapy three times a week. You have indicated that physiotherapy is not available close to the locality in which you reside. You reside close to the border and commute to the United States for physiotherapy and the distance roundtrip from your home to the place where you receive treatment is XXXXXXXXXX kilometres.
Written confirmation of the tax consequences that apply to a particular fact situation is given by this Directorate only in the context of an advanced income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular 70-6R5, Advanced Income Tax Rulings, dated May 17, 2002. This Information Circular and other Canada Revenue Agency publications can be accessed on the CRA Web site at www.cra-arc.gc.ca. However, we are prepared to provide the following general comments, which may be of assistance.
Our Comments
Medical expenses which are eligible for the medical expense tax credit ("METC") are limited to those described in subsection 118.2(2) of the Income Tax Act ("Act"). If a particular expenditure is not described as an eligible medical expense in subsection 118.2(2) of the Act, or if the conditions under which the expenditure would qualify are not met, the expenditure does not qualify for purposes of the METC, even though the expenditure may have been incurred for medical reasons.
Under paragraph 118.2(2)(g) of the Act, an individual may claim as an eligible medical expense an amount paid to a person engaged in the business of providing transportation services, to the extent that the payment is made for the transportation of
(i) the patient, and
(ii) one individual who accompanied the patient, where the patient was, and has been certified by a medical practitioner to be, incapable of travelling without the assistance of an attendant from the locality where the patient dwells to a place, not less than 40 kilometres from that locality, where medical services are normally provided, or from that place to that locality, if
(iii) substantially equivalent medical services are not available in that locality,
(iv) the route travelled by the patient is, having regard to the circumstances, a reasonably direct route, and
(v) the patient travels to that place to obtain medical services for himself or herself and it is reasonable, having regard to the circumstances, for the patient to travel to that place to obtain those services.
In addition, under paragraph 118.2(2)(h) of the Act, an individual may claim an amount paid for reasonable travel expenses (for example, accommodation and meals) incurred in respect of the patient and, where the patient was, and has been certified by a medical practitioner to be, incapable of travelling without the assistance of an attendant, in respect of one individual who accompanied the patient, to obtain medical services in a place that is not less than 80 kilometres from the locality where the patient dwells if the circumstances described in subparagraphs (g)(iii), (iv) and (v) above apply.
While it is a question of fact whether the above requirements are met, it is our view that the requirement in (iii) may be met even if medical services are available nearer to the individual's locality if, in the circumstances, it is reasonable for the individual to have travelled to the place where the medical services were obtained.
It is our view, based on the information provided, that the travel costs incurred for the physiotherapy outside of Canada likely qualify as medical expenses for purposes of the METC.
We trust our comments will be of assistance.
Yours truly,
G. Moore
For Director
Trusts and Business Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2012
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2012