Docket: IMM-12975-24
Citation: 2025 FC 1476
Toronto, Ontario, September 8, 2025
PRESENT: The Honourable Justice Battista
|
BETWEEN: |
|
UMAIR AKBAR |
|
Applicant |
|
and |
|
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION |
|
Respondent |
JUDGMENT AND REASONS
(Delivered orally from the bench on September 8, 2025)
[1] In this judicial review application, Umair Akbar challenges the second refusal of his study permit application. His study permit application was first refused on January 17, 2024, and that decision was set aside for redetermination with the consent of the Respondent. On redetermination, Mr. Akbar’s study permit application was again refused on July 22, 2024.
[2] The Respondent agrees that the latest refusal decision rendered on Mr. Akbar’s study permit application is unreasonable and has offered to set aside and redetermine the application. Mr. Akbar refused the settlement offer because he is concerned about the delay as a result of the two refusals, and he is concerned about changes in study permit regulations and policy that have prejudiced him since the time of his first application.
[3] I agree with the parties that the decision refusing Mr. Akbar’s study permit application is unreasonable and will be set aside because of its disregard of the relevant factual constraints, specifically, the evidence and submissions of Mr. Akbar (Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, at paras 105-107, 125-128).
[4] I also agree with Mr. Akbar that he has been prejudiced by two unreasonable decisions on his study permit application. To address this prejudice and in an attempt to avoid further prejudice, directions will be provided pursuant to subsection 18.1(3)(b) of the Federal Courts Act RSC, 1985, c F-7 for the redetermination of the application (ABCD v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1296 at para 67).