Reeve
T
.0.:
This
taxation
of
costs
was
scheduled
to
be
heard
by
conference
call
at
11:00
a.m.
(PST)
on
Thursday
May
13,
1999.
It
follows
the
judgment
of
the
Honourable
Judge
Bonner,
dated
March
17,
1998,
dismissing
the
appeal
with
costs.
Ms.
Charlotte
Coombs,
represented
the
Respondent.
Attempts
were
made
to
contact
Mr.
Nesis,
the
Appellant,
but
he
was
not
able
to
be
contacted
by
the
Court
at
the
time
fixed
for
the
hearing.
The
matter
was
adjourned
for
thirty
minutes
pursuant
to
section
13.
of
the
General
Procedure
Rules,
in
a
further
effort
to
contact
the
Appellant.
An
examination
of
the
file
indicates
that
the
Court
wrote
Mr.
Nesis,
on
November
10,
1998,
requesting
that
a
telephone
number
be
provided
where
he
could
be
reached.
He
was
sent
the
Notice
of
Appointment
for
Taxation
of
Costs
by
registered
mail
on
March
10,
1999,
to
the
last
known
address
provided,
indicating
the
method,
time
and
date
that
the
matter
would
be
heard.
Thirty
minutes
after
the
time
fixed
for
the
taxation
of
costs
Mr.
Nesis
was
not
available.
A
brief
submission
was
heard
from
Ms.
Coombs,
who
observed
that
a
mathematical
error
existed
in
the
Bill
of
Costs.
Decision
The
Respondent’s
Bill
of
Costs
results
after
a
Notice
of
Appeal
filed
by
the
Appellant
on
October
18,
1995,
pursuant
to
the
Income
Tax
Act.
The
appeal
was
instituted
under
the
General
Procedure
Rules.
The
Bill
of
Costs,
received
at
the
Court
on
August
6,
1998,
provides
as
follows:
1.(1)
Services
of
Counsel:
|
1(1)(a)
|
For
all
services
in
a
proceeding
prior
to
an
examination
|
$
400.00
|
|
for
discovery,
|
|
|
1(1)(b)
|
For
the
Status
Hearing
held
on
May
13,
1997
|
400.00
|
|
1(1)(b)
|
For
the
Examinations
for
Discovery
(November
28,
|
800.00
|
|
1997
and
December
1,
1997,
2
days
at
$400.00
per
day)
|
|
|
1(1)(b)
|
For
the
Respondent’s
Written
Submissions,
January
16,
|
400.00
|
|
1998
|
|
|
l(l)(e)
|
For
the
preparation
for
hearing
|
600.00
|
|
1(1)(d)
|
For
conduct
of
the
hearing
for
each
day
or
part
thereof
|
3000.00
|
|
(2
days
January,
12
and
January
13,
1998
at
$1500.00
|
|
|
per
day)
|
|
|
1(1)(e)
|
For
all
services
after
judgment
|
300.00
|
|
1(1)(b)
|
For
Taxation
of
Costs
|
400.00
|
|
TOTAL
COSTS
|
$
6300.00
|
|
1(2)
|
Disbursements
(Include
GST
and
PST)
|
|
|
Discovery
Transcripts
|
$
231.31
|
|
Courier
|
23.44
|
|
Witness
Fees
|
|
|
.
conduct
money
for
Azmina
Hirji
for
Jan.
13/98
|
50.00
|
|
Photocopying
|
43.69
|
|
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS:
|
$
348.44
|
|
TOTAL
COSTS
AND
DISBURSEMENTS:
|
$6,748.44
|
|
TOTAL
FEES
DISBURSEMENTS
AND
TAXES
|
$6,748.44
|
The
Bill
of
Costs
was
accompanied
by
invoices
to
cover
disbursements.
The
amounts
claimed
are
consistent
with
the
amounts
allowed
pursuant
to
Tariff
B
for
a
Class
C
appeal.
The
respondent
claimed
$400
for
the
preparation
of
four
pages
of
written
argument
and
submissions
on
January
16
,
that
had
been
requested
by
the
Court.
In
the
case
of
Bishop
v.
Minister
of
National
Revenue
(unreported),
T.C.C.,
Doc.
No.
90-3848(IT)
February
12,
1994,
[reported
(1993),
93
D.T.C.
333
(T.C.C.)]
the
Registrar
allowed
costs
for
the
preparation
in
writing
of
the
Appellant’s
submissions.
I
will
follow
the
reasoning
in
that
case
and
allow
the
amount
of
$400.00
in
this
instance.
I
have
examined
the
documentation
submitted
covering
disbursements
and
the
amounts
claimed
for
services
of
counsel
under
the
tariff.
An
error
existed
in
the
mathematical
calculation
of
the
Bill
of
Costs.
The
total
amount
of
$6,648.44
is
allowed.
Application
allowed.