Lamarre
Proulx
T.C.J.:
This
appeal
concerns
the
credit
for
a
severe
and
prolonged
physical
impairment
provided
for
in
section
118.3
of
the
Income
Tax
Act
(“the
Act”).
The
impairment
is
caused
by
cystic
fibrosis,
which
both
of
the
appellant’s
children
have.
The
credit
is
being
claimed
by
the
children’s
father
under
subsection
118.3(2)
of
the
Act.
The
taxation
year
involved
is
1994.
Dr.
Georges
B.
Rivard,
Dr.
André
M.
Cantin,
Denise
Harvey
and
the
appellant
testified
at
the
request
of
counsel
for
the
appellant.
No
witnesses
testified
for
the
respondent.
The
children
of
the
appellant
and
his
spouse,
Denise
Harvey,
are
named
Marc-André
and
Patricia.
They
were
born
in
1981
and
1984,
respectively.
Ms.
Harvey
explained
that
Patricia
was
nine
months
old
when
it
was
discovered
that
both
children
had
cystic
fibrosis.
Until
then,
Marc-André
was
thought
to
have
chronic
asthma.
Since
the
tests
done
on
Patricia
showed
that
she
had
cystic
fibrosis,
the
same
tests
were
done
on
Marc-André,
who
had
the
same
symptoms.
Ms.
Harvey
explained
that
the
treatment
requires
respiratory
therapy
and
percussion
sessions
twice
a
day.
The
respiratory
therapy
takes
30
minutes.
In
addition
to
the
treatment
itself,
the
aerosol
must
be
prepared
and
the
compressor
must
be
cleaned
at
the
end
of
the
session.
Thirty
minutes
are
also
needed
for
the
percussion.
That
comes
to
a
total
of
four
hours
for
the
two
children.
In
addition
to
the
treatment,
the
children
must
be
negotiated
with
every
day
to
get
them
to
undergo
the
treatment
and
take
their
medication.
When
the
family
plans
an
activity,
the
compressors
and
other
devices
needed
for
the
respiratory
therapy
and
percussion
must
be
brought
along.
Family
outings
require
a
great
deal
of
baggage.
The
parents
have
never
gone
on
holiday
alone
in
the
18
years
they
have
been
married.
The
children
are
prone
to
lung
infections,
and
the
parents
often
have
to
go
and
pick
them
up
at
school
because
they
are
coughing
too
much.
Ms.
Harvey
estimated
that
this
happens
on
anywhere
from
25
to
40
days
per
school
year.
The
children
take
part
in
physical
activities
at
the
school
in
moderation.
Initially,
the
family
went
to
the
Centre
Hospitalier
de
l’Université
Lavai
(“CHUL”)
in
Québec
once
a
month.
This
later
became
once
every
two
months
and
is
now
once
every
three
months.
The
family
lives
in
the
Charlevoix
area.
The
children’s
mother
explained
that
cystic
fibrosis
affects
not
only
the
respiratory
system
but
also
the
digestion
of
food.
The
pancreas
does
not
produce
the
enzymes
needed
for
digestion,
which
means
that
a
person
who
has
the
disease
cannot
digest
without
taking
medication.
Bowel
functions
are
therefore
different
from
those
of
other
people.
Using
the
school
washrooms
is
a
major
problem
for
the
children,
since
their
stools
are
foulsmelling.
Moreover,
the
inability
to
digest
causes
stomachaches.
Taking
enzymes
relieves
the
non-assimilation
of
food,
but
not
fully,
since
the
enzymes
must
be
taken
in
the
proper
doses
so
as
not
to
cause
further
problems.
The
children
have
to
eat
more
because
of
their
problem
with
assimilation
of
food.
In
spite
of
this,
they
remain
smaller
and
frailer
than
other
children.
As
regards
bowel
functions,
while
a
normal
person
eliminates
about
once
a
day,
they
do
so
two
or
three
times
a
day.
Dr.
Rivard
is
one
of
the
appellant’s
children’s
attending
physicians.
He
is
a
pediatrician
who
has
been
working
at
the
CHUL
since
1976
and
the
codirector
of
the
cystic
fibrosis
clinic.
The
clinic
consists
of
four
pediatricians
and
other
professionals,
including
a
social
worker,
who
make
up
a
team.
The
children
may
be
seen
by
any
of
the
pediatricians,
but
each
child’s
case
is
discussed
at
weekly
meetings
attended
by
the
professionals.
Dr.
Rivard
filed
a
medical
report
on
each
of
the
two
children
as
Exhibit
A-5.
The
Pillion
children
began
going
to
the
clinic
in
May
1985.
Dr.
Rivard
explained
that
pancreatic
supplements,
vitamins
and
sometimes
antibiotics
must
be
taken
every
day.
Antibiotics
have
to
be
taken
daily
if
there
are
respiratory
infections;
otherwise,
they
are
taken
periodically.
The
Pillion
children
take
antibiotics
every
day
for
medical
reasons.
The
antibiotics
are
mixed
with
the
aerosol.
Respiratory
therapy
and
physiotherapy
are
required
twice
daily.
The
latter
treatment
involves
clapping
the
children
on
the
thorax
and
back.
In
the
case
of
young
children,
the
treatment
is
usually
administered
by
their
parents.
When
they
get
older,
they
can
give
themselves
the
treatment
using
a
device
for
that
purpose
or
ask
a
friend
to
do
it
for
them.
Marc-André
was
hospitalized
in
June
1994
because
his
respiratory
capacity
had
fallen
to
39
percent.
It
subsequently
went
back
up
to
65
percent.
Patricia
has
also
been
hospitalized,
just
once,
for
nasal
polyps
that
were
not
really
related
to
her
cystic
fibrosis.
However,
since
1991,
she
has
had
chronic
bronchitis
and
her
respiratory
capacity
has
been
at
60
percent.
Dr.
Rivard
explained
that
cystic
fibrosis
is
a
severe
disease
that
used
to
cause
early
death.
Today,
life
expectancy
has
been
extended,
but
at
the
cost
of
higher
morbidity.
It
is
essential
that
parents
and
children
adhere
to
the
daily
treatment
program.
Pancreatic
enzymes
must
be
taken
with
each
meal
and
snack.
The
same
applies
to
the
extra
vitamins.
Bowel
movements
are
heavy
and
foul-smelling,
and
they
occur
two
or
three
times
a
day.
The
use
of
public
washrooms
is
upsetting
and
distressing.
This
digestive
problem
has
an
effect
on
growth
and
the
number
of
stools
and
causes
stomachaches.
The
certificates
completed
by
Dr.
Pierre
Bigonesse
and
filed
as
Exhibits
A-2
and
A-3
indicated
that
the
children
could
perform
each
of
the
activities
described
in
the
questionnaire
(Form
T2201A(E)).
Those
activities
are
as
follows:
vision,
walking,
speaking,
mental
functions,
hearing,
feeding
and
dressing,
and
elimination.
As
well,
the
doctor
answered
no
to
the
question
asking
whether
the
impairment
was
severe
enough
to
restrict
the
basic
activities
of
daily
living
all
or
almost
all
the
time,
even
with
the
use
of
appropriate
aids,
medication
or
therapy.
Dr.
Rivard
said
that
he
would
probably
have
answered
the
questionnaire
the
same
way
since,
in
his
opinion,
it
did
not
ask
all
the
relevant
questions.
He
said
that,
on
the
former
questionnaire,
the
description
of
the
impairment
included
an
Other
box
that
the
doctor
could
use
to
specify
the
nature
of
the
impairment.
The
former
questionnaire,
which
was
completed
in
1990
by
Dr.
Rivard,
was
filed
as
Exhibit
I-1.
The
document
referred
to
an
appended
letter,
which
was
filed
as
Exhibit
A-4
and
which
clearly
sets
out
the
problems
that
individuals
with
this
disease
have
and
the
inordinate
amount
of
time
they
require
to
maintain
their
respiratory
capacity.
Dr.
Rivard
added
that
the
current
questionnaire
does
not
provide
for
the
function
of
breathing,
which
is
what
is
affected
by
cystic
fibrosis.
An
individual
with
the
disease
must
spend
more
than
two
hours
a
day
in
order
to
maintain
that
function
at
a
level
that
is
well
below
normal.
The
parents’
time
must
also
be
added,
since
a
parent
must
participate
in
the
treatment
along
with
the
individual
undergoing
it.
Parents
must
pay
constant
attention
to
their
child.
Dr.
Cantin
testified
as
an
expert
witness.
He
is
a
lung
specialist
for
adults,
and
he
treats
adults
who
have
cystic
fibrosis.
He
is
also
a
researcher
at
the
faculty
of
medicine
of
the
Université
de
Sherbrooke.
Although
all
of
Dr.
Cantin’s
five-page
report
is
of
great
interest
and
worth
quoting,
I
will
reproduce
two
passages
from
the
report
for
the
purposes
of
these
reasons:
[TRANSLATION]
What
is
cystic
fibrosis?
Cystic
fibrosis
is
the
most
common
fatal
hereditary
disease
in
Canada.
It
is
caused
by
a
defect
in
the
cystic
fibrosis
gene
on
chromosome
7.
About
one
person
in
twenty
in
Canada
carries
an
abnormal
cystic
fibrosis
gene.
When
both
members
of
a
couple
carry
a
defective
gene,
there
is
one
chance
in
four
of
having
a
child
with
cystic
fibrosis.
For
each
2,000
births,
there
will
be
one
child
with
this
disease.
Cystic
fibrosis
affects
all
tissues
whose
function
involves
the
production
of
secretions.
The
lungs,
the
pancreas,
the
intestines
and
the
reproductive
system
are
among
the
organs
most
affected
by
cystic
fibrosis.
The
symptoms
of
the
disease
are
caused
by
a
significant
increase
in
the
viscosity
of
secretions,
which
leads
to
an
obstruction
of
these
various
organs
and
eventually
tissue
destruction
and
functional
insufficiency
in
these
same
organs.
Time
spent
treating
cystic
fibrosis
The
usual
treatment
for
a
cystic
fibrosis
patient
includes
respiratory
therapy
and
physiotherapy
sessions,
the
taking
of
many
medications
and
the
aerosolization
of
antibiotics,
bronchodilators
and
mucolytics
through
respiratory
therapy.
All
of
this
takes
the
following
time:
°
aerosolization
of
antibiotics:
20
minutes
two
or
three
times
a
day;
•
aerosolization
of
Pulmosyme
(mucolytic):
20
minutes
once
a
day;
°
session
of
respiratory
physiotherapy
through
postural
drainage:
30
minutes
twice
a
day;
°
taking
of
many
medications
in
tablet
form
and
sometimes
insulin
injections:
5
minutes
four
times
a
day;
•
taking
of
food
supplements
and
high-calorie
diet:
5-10
minutes
per
meal.
il
time
spent
on
daily
treatment
of
cystic
fibrosis:
2-3
hours.
This
estimate
of
the
time
required
to
treat
cystic
fibrosis
does
not
include
the
many
antibiotic
treatments,
which
are
increasingly
being
administered
intravenously
at
home.
It
is
therefore
a
realistic
and
relatively
conservative
estimate.
Subsection
118.4(1)
of
the
Act
reads
as
follows:
For
the
purposes
of
subsection
6(16),
sections
118.2
and
118.3
and
this
subsection,
(a)
an
impairment
is
prolonged
where
it
has
lasted,
or
can
reasonably
be
expected
to
last,
for
a
continuous
period
of
at
least
12
months:
(b)
an
individual’s
ability
to
perform
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living
is
markedly
restricted
only
where
all
or
substantially
all
of
the
time,
even
with
therapy
and
the
use
of
appropriate
devices
and
medication,
the
individual
is
blind
or
is
unable
(or
requires
an
inordinate
amount
of
time)
to
perform
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living;
(c)
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living
in
relation
to
an
individual
means
(1)
perceiving,
thinking
and
remembering,
(ii)
feeding
and
dressing
oneself,
(iii)
speaking
so
as
to
be
understood,
in
a
quiet
setting,
by
another
person
familiar
with
the
individual,
(iv)
hearing
so
as
to
understand,
in
a
quiet
setting,
another
person
familiar
with
the
individual,
(v)
eliminating
(bowel
or
bladder
functions),
or
(vi)
walking;
and
(d)
for
greater
certainty,
no
other
activity,
including
working,
housekeeping
or
a
social
or
recreational
activity,
shall
be
considered
as
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living.
[Emphasis
added.]
Counsel
for
the
appellant
argued
that,
even
though
breathing
is
not
referred
to
in
paragraph
118.4(l)(c)
of
the
Act,
it
should
be
considered
in
the
same
way
as
the
activities
described
in
that
paragraph,
for
otherwise
section
15
of
the
Canadian
Charter
of
Rights
and
Freedoms
would
be
violated.
She
therefore
argued
that
the
children
here
required
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
each
day
to
maintain
their
respiratory
capacity.
Counsel
for
the
respondent
told
the
Court
that
it
has
never
been
the
respondent’s
view
that
respiratory
capacity
is
not
a
basic
activity,
since
it
is
the
basis
for
all
the
activities
referred
to
in
paragraph
118.4(1)(c)
of
the
Act.
However,
she
referred
to
decisions
by
this
Court
in
cases
involving
juvenile
diabetes
in
which
it
was
found
that
the
child
could
perform
the
basic
activities
of
daily
living
with
the
use
of
medication.
I
refer
here
to
the
most
recent
decision
on
this
matter
by
the
Federal
Court
of
Appeal,
Johnston
v.
R.,
[1998]
2
C.T.C.
262
(Fed.
C.A.).
That
court
directed
its
attention
to
the
question
of
what
constitutes
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
in
performing
the
basic
activities
of
daily
living.
I
quote
paragraphs
16
to
18:
[16]
In
order
to
benefit
from
the
tax
credit
under
s.
118.3,
a
taxpayer
suffering
from
a
severe
and
prolonged
physical
impairment
has
to
establish
that
his
ability
to
perform
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living
is
markedly
restricted.
[17]
The
expression
“markedly
restricted”
has
been
defined
to
refer
to
an
individual’s
inability,
at
all
or
substantially
all
of
the
time,
even
with
therapy
and
the
use
of
appropriate
device
[sic]
and
medication,
to
perform
a
basic
activity
of
daily
living.
An
individual’s
s
ability
is
also
deemed
to
be
marked]
restricted
1
he
requires
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
to
perform
such
activity.
[18]
No
definition
has
been
given
of
what
constitutes
an
inordinate
amount
of
time
in
the
performance
of
the
basic
activities
of
daily
living.
In
my
view,
the
expression
“inordinate
amount
of
time”
refers
to
an
excessive
amount
of
time,
that
is
to
say
one
much
longer
than
what
is
usually
required
by
normal
people.
It
[Emphasis
added.
I
|
requires,
a.
marked
|
r
|
from
normality.
|
It
is
my
view
that
the
evidence
has
clearly
shown
beyond
a
shadow
of
a
doubt
that
the
appellant’s
children
require
an
excessive
amount
of
time,
that
is
to
say,
much
more
time
than
is
usually
required
by
normal
people,
to
maintain
their
respiratory
capacity.
Accordingly,
the
appeal
is
allowed
with
costs.
Appeal
allowed.