Brulé
7.C.J.:
The
two
appellants
appeal
their
assessments
as
follows:
-Evelyn
F.
Osei
(E.O.)
for
the
1993,
1994
and
1995
taxation
years.
The
case
was
heard
in
Toronto,
Ontario,
on
November
24,
1998.
-Kwabena
Osei
(K.O.)
for
the
1993
and
1994
taxation
years.
Each
is
claiming
the
equivalent
to
spouse
credit
for
the
taxation
years
involved.
Facts
During
the
trial,
which
was
held
concurrently
for
both
appellants,
a
translator
of
the
Akan
language
was
present
and
assisted
the
Court
when
necessary.
The
appellants
were
apparently
married
for
the
years
in
question,
but
they
claimed
to
have
been
living
separate
and
apart.
Each
maintained
a
residence
and
on
the
advice
of
a
third
party
they
attempted
a
reconciliation
on
more
than
one
occasion.
Each
time
this
occurred
such
lasted
only
about
two
days.
At
no
time
did
K.O.
pay
any
money
towards
the
support
of
his
spouse.
The
appellant
K.O.
also
appealed
the
denial
of
Ontario
Tax
Credits.
The
respondent
submitted
that
the
Tax
Court
did
not
have
jurisdiction
to
consider
this
point
and
so
the
matter
was
not
pursued.
Issue
The
main
issue
is
whether
or
not
the
appellants
were
living
together
during
the
periods
in
question.
Analysis
During
argument,
counsel
for
the
respondent
told
the
Court
that
if
the
appellants
were
not
living
together
during
the
periods
in
question
then
the
appeals
should
be
allowed.
Naturally,
counsel
took
the
opposite
view
that
the
appellants
were
indeed
living
together
during
the
years
in
question.
The
Court
took
the
opposite
view.
The
evidence
given
by
both
appellants,
which
was
not
rebutted,
showed
that
the
brief
trial
reconciliations
did
not
constitute
a
couple
living
together.
Their
eligibility
for
their
respective
appeal
depended
on
their
living
apart
which
in
the
Court’s
opinion
they
were.
This
coupled
with
the
parole
argument
by
counsel
for
the
respondent
is
then
sufficient
for
the
Court
to
come
to
the
conclusion
that
the
appellants
were
living
apart
during
the
years
in
question.
Accordingly,
the
appeals
are
allowed
other
than
the
Ontario
Tax
Credit
and
the
matters
are
hereby
to
be
returned
to
the
Minister
of
National
Revenue
for
reconsideration
and
reassessment.
Appeals
allowed.