1.
The
taxpayer
owned
and
operated
logging
trucks
as
a
proprietor
during
1977
and
1978
which
were
used
for
logging
in
the
area
of
Vanderhoof,
British
Columbia.
2.
The
taxpayer
was
subcontracted
to
haul
logs
by
E
Clemmenson,
a
contractor
of
Plateau
Mills
Ltd,
Vanderhoof,
BC
which
regards
log
hauling
as
a
logging
activity.
3.
As
per
the
attached
schedule
of
log
hauling
activities,
off-highway
miles
travelled
by
the
taxpayer’s
trucks
comprised
80%
to
85%
of
the
travelled
miles,
with
virtually
100%
of
revenue
miles
being
off-highway.
4.
Log
hauling,
and
in
particular
off-highway
log
hauling,
is
recognized
as
a
major
component
of
logging
activity,
both
by
the
logging
and
sawmill
industry
in
general
and
by
various
Loggers
Associations
specifically.
5.
The
taxpayer
was
and
continues
to
be
a
member
of
the
Northern
Independent
Loggers
Association.
6.
Logging
was
a
designated
activity
for
purposes
of
the
investment
tax
credit,
as
specified
in
paragraph
127(10)(c)(vii)
of
the
Income
Tax
Act
when
the
taxpayer
acquired
his
logging
equipment.
15.
...
The
taxpayer
was
engaged
in
the
transportation
of
logs
which
is
one
facet
of
logging
operations,
just
as
a
feller
buncher
or
a
powersaw
fells
the
trees,
a
rubber
skidder
or
crawler
tractor
transports
the
trees,
and
a
loader
loads
the
trees
onto
trucks,
all
of
which
are
also
facets
of
the
overall
logging
operations.
We
submit
that
the
taxpayer’s
log
hauling
was
both
transportation
and
logging
With
transportation
of
the
logs
being
one
step
in
the
logging
operations.
The
respondent’s
position
was:
The
only
point
at
issue
before
the
Board
is
whether
the
activity
of
the
appellant
falls
within
the
appropriate
definition
of
“logging”.
The
situation
cannot
be
distinguished
from
the
comments
provided
in
Lor-Wes
Contracting
Ltd
v
Her
Majesty
The
Queen,
[1982]
CTC
415;
83
DTC
5016,
and
the
appeal
is
dismissed.