Date: 19981203
Docket: A-42-98
CORAM: PRATTE J.A.
DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
DANIELLE DRUDI
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec,
on Thursday, December 3, 1998)
PRATTE J.A.
[1] We are all of the opinion that, in deciding as he did, Mr. Justice Rouleau made no error warranting our intervention.
[2] The application for judicial review will therefore be dismissed.
Louis Pratte
J.A.
Certified true translation
Peter Douglas
Date: 19981203
Docket: A-42-98
CORAM: PRATTE J.A.
DESJARDINS J.A.
DÉCARY J.A.
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
DANIELLE DRUDI
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on Thursday, December 3, 1998.
Judgment delivered from the bench on Thursday, December 3, 1998.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: PRATTE J.A.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Date: 19981203
Docket: A-42-98
BETWEEN:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Applicant
- and -
DANIELLE DRUDI
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
OF THE COURT
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
COURT FILE NO.: A-42-98
STYLE OF CAUSE: Attorney General of Canada
v. Danielle Drudi
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: December 3 and 4, 1998
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT:(Pratte, Desjardins, Décary JJ.A.)
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Pratte J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Carole Bureau for the applicant
Suzon Létourneau
Jean-Guy Ouellet for the respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Morris Rosenberg for the applicant
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
Campeau Ouellet & Associés for the respondent
Avocats
Montréal, Quebec
Email this Content