Date: 20020815
Docket: IMM-5469-00
Neutral citation: 2002 FCT 871
BETWEEN:
AZIZ UR RAHMAN
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF
CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
ROTHSTEIN J.A. (ex officio)
-
- This is a judicial review of a decision of a visa officer which denied the applicant's application for permanent residence in the occupation of a social worker. The basis of the decision was that the applicant did not have a bachelor's degree in social work as required for the occupation of social work in the National Occupational Classification (NOC).
-
[2] The applicant had an MA in Social Anthropology from Peshawar University in Pakistan. He says this was, for all intents and purposes, equivalent to a degree in social work. At the very least, he says, if the visa officer was in doubt on this point, he should have been given an opportunity to clear up any ambiguity.
[3] Upon a review of the record, it appears that all references to the applicant's education are to a degree in anthropology or social anthropology. The courses taken by the applicant e.g. Principles of Anthropology, Ethnography, Applied Anthropology, Political Anthropology, confirm that the substance of his education was anthropology.
[4] I do not overlook the fact that some of his courses might have some relationship to social work e.g. Criminology, or perhaps, Field Work. The applicant says that courses change over time and that the substance of an anthropology degree could be considered the same as a social work degree. If that were correct, it seems to me that the applicant was obliged to make that point in his visa application. He did not. The NOC requirement is a degree in social work. On its face, the applicant did not have that degree. I cannot say that the visa officer erred in finding that he did not meet the employment requirements for the occupation of social worker.
[5] Nor do I think there was an obligation on the visa officer to interview the applicant or make further inquiries as to whether his degree in anthropology was equivalent to a degree in social work. Apart from the fact that there was no obligation on the visa officer to conduct an interview on the facts of this case, there was no ambiguity to clear up. The applicant says the visa officer seems to have been under a misapprehension, but that is not apparent from the record. She saw that the applicant did not have a degree in social work and that he, therefore, did not meet the employment requirements for the social work occupation. There was no ambiguity.
[6] The applicant says that the visa officer misconstrued a letter of reference as not indicating experience in social work. However, this issue does not arise. Because he did not have a degree in social work, he did not meet the employment requirements for the job of social worker. The visa officer was obliged to deny his application for that reason alone.
[7] The judicial review should be dismissed.
"Marshall Rothstein"
Judge
Toronto, Ontario
August 15, 2002
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
DOCKET: IMM-5469-00
STYLE OF CAUSE: AZIZ UR RAHMAN
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO
DATE OF HEARING: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 14, 2002
REASONS FOR ORDER BY: ROTHSTEIN J.
DATED: THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 2002
APPEARANCES BY: Mr. Rocco Galati
For the Applicant
Mr. David Tyndale, and
Ms. Pamela Larmondin
For the Respondent
SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Galati, Rodrigues, Azevedo & Associates
Barristers & Solicitors
203-637 College St.
Toronto, Ontario
M6G 1B5
For the Applicant
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For the Respondent
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date:20020815
Docket: IMM-5469-00
BETWEEN:
AZIZ UR RAHMAN
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
Email this Content