Date: 20001017
Docket: IMM-3637-99
BETWEEN:
MURALI KRISHNA TEDLA
Applicant
- and -
THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP
AND IMMIGRATION
Respondent
REASONS FOR ORDER
(Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario
on Tuesday, October 17, 2000)
ROTHSTEIN J. A. (ex officio)
[1] Despite the argument of counsel for the applicant, I am unable to conclude that any procedural fairness issues arise here. I do not think that there is any general obligation on a visa officer to confront an applicant with concerns arising from the face of documents submitted by the applicant. This is not the case of extrinsic evidence of which the applicant would have no notice. Nor do the cases cited by the applicant deal with the facts of this case. The judicial review must be dismissed.
"Marshall Rothstein"
J.A.
TORONTO, ONTARIO
October 17, 2000
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record
| STYLE OF CAUSE: MURALI KRISHNA TEDLA |
Applicant
| THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION |
Respondent
| DATE OF HEARING: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2000 |
| PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO |
| REASONS FOR ORDER BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A. |
| DATED: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2000 |
| APPEARANCES BY: Mr. M. Max Chaudhary |
| SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Chaudhary Law Office |
Barristers & Solicitors
255 Duncan Mill Road, Suite 405
North York, Ontario
M3B 3H9
Morris Rosenberg
| Deputy Attorney General of Canada |
FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA
Date: 20001017
Docket: IMM-3637-99
BETWEEN:
Applicant
| THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION |
Respondent
Email this Content