Date: 20000828
Docket: 98-124-IT-I
BETWEEN:
MICHAEL NACH,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Reasons for Judgment
Hamlyn, J.T.C.C.
[1] This is a purported appeal with respect to the 1995 and
1996 taxation years.
[2] In computing income for the 1995 and 1996 taxation years,
the Appellant deducted the amounts of $16,247.00 and $12,609.00
respectively, as farming losses.
[3] As a preliminary objection in relation to the
Appellant's purported appeal for the 1995 and 1996 taxation
years the Minister of National Revenue ("the Minister")
submits that the Appellant's appeal for the 1995 and 1996
taxation years ought to be dismissed as the Appellant did not
serve on the Minister Notices of Objection to the assessments for
the said taxation years as required by section 169 of the
Income Tax Act ("the Act").
[4] The Minister assessed the Appellant for the 1995 and 1996
taxation years by Notices of Assessment mailed on May 30, 1996
and May 27, 1997 respectively. The Notices of Reassessment are
dated October 27, 1997.
[5] The Appellant's evidence was that on January 26, 1998
he filed a Notice of Appeal with the Tax Court of Canada and
thereafter on that same date served a Notice of Objection and a
copy of the Notice of Appeal to the Minister.
[6] The Minister, on February 16, 1998, wrote to the Appellant
and stated "We have received your objection. As soon as we
complete our initial review, we will contact you or your
authorized representative."
[7] The Appellant on this point heard nothing further from the
Minister save that in the Reply to Notice of Appeal (April 1,
1998) the Minister pleaded the preliminary objection that the
Appellant did not serve on the Minister Notices of Objection to
the assessments for the 1995 and 1996 taxation years.
[8] Section 165 of the Act provides the requirements
for objections to assessments. A Notice of Objection is the first
step in the appeal procedure set out in the Act. It is
only by serving a Notice of Objection within the proper time
limit that a taxpayer may ultimately launch an appeal which may
be heard by the Tax Court of Canada. The taxpayer has the benefit
of 90 days after the day of mailing of the Notice of Assessment
to serve a written Notice of Objection containing the reasons for
objection and all relevant facts. In the present appeal, the
facts clearly show that the Notices of Reassessment are dated
October 27, 1997 while the Appellant's Notice of Objection
was served on January 26, 1998. According to the calendar, the
Appellant's 90th day would have been January 25, 1998.
However, January 25, 1998 was a Sunday.
[9] According to section 26 of the Interpretation Act,
R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, the Appellant has the benefit of an extra
day:
26. Where the time limited for the doing of a thing expires or
falls on a holiday, the thing may be done on the day next
following that is not a holiday.
[10] Subsection 35(1) of the Interpretation Act defines
a "holiday" as including Sunday, which is the situation
in the present appeal. The Appellant's Notice of Objection
was validly served within the prescribed period.
[11] The next matter to be dealt with is the validity of the
Appellant's Notice of Appeal, which was filed on the same day
as the Notice of Objection was served. Subsection 169(1) of the
Act provides that a taxpayer may only appeal to the Tax
Court of Canada after either (a) the Minister has confirmed the
assessment or reassessed, or (b) after 90 days have elapsed after
service of the Notice of Objection.
[12] The effect of this section in relation to the purported
Notice of Appeal that was filed is that the Notice of Appeal was
filed prematurely. As a consequence there is no valid Notice of
Appeal before this Court.
[13] Procedurally the Court cannot dispose of an appeal until
there is a valid appeal filed in accordance with the Act.
Therefore the Court cannot proceed further in this matter until
there has been compliance with subsection 169(1) of the
Act.
[14] The appeal is therefore quashed.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 28th day of August 2000.
"D. Hamlyn"
J.T.C.C.