Date:
20020906
Docket:
2002-773-IT-I
BETWEEN:
ALEXANDRA
JUNE ROUSE,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY
THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Reasons
for Judgment
Little,
J.
A.
FACTS
[1]
In the 1998 and 1999 taxation years the Appellant was employed by
Pearce Holdings Ltd. Pearce Holdings Ltd. operated under the name
of Lynn Valley Meats ("Lynn").
[2]
The Appellant filed her income tax returns reporting income
received from Pearce Holdings Ltd. as follows:
1998
-
$6,173.80
1999
-
$5,106.43
(Note: T-4
slips were issued by Pearce Holdings Ltd. for the Appellant
showing the income reported by the Appellant.)
[3]
The Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister")
issued Notices of Assessment for the Appellant's 1998 and
1999 taxation years in which the Minister accepted the income
that was reported by the Appellant.
[4]
The Appellant filed Notices of Objection to the Notices of
Assessment issued for the 1998 and 1999 taxation years. Officials
of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency ( the
"C.C.R.A.") carried out a detailed analysis of the
payroll records of Lynn and determined that a correction should
be made. By Notice of Reassessment dated the 14th day of November
2000 the Minister reduced the Appellant's income for the 1998
taxation year by the amount of $511.90. The Minister also issued
an amended T-4 slip in which it was stated that the Appellant had
received income of $5,661.90 rather than $6,173.80 from Pearce
Holdings Ltd. in the 1998 taxation year.
[5]
The Appellant filed a Notice of Appeal to the Tax Court for the
1998 and 1999 taxation years.
[6]
During the hearing of the appeals the Appellant admitted that she
had signed receipts showing the payments received by her from
Lynn.
[7]
The Appellant also introduced as evidence copies of what are
described as PD Examinations (Exhibit A-3 and Exhibit A-4)
prepared by officials of C.C.R.A. Exhibit A-3 prepared by J.
Schneider covers the period from January 1, 1997 to August 31,
2000. Exhibit A-4, prepared by Mr. M. Rowlands, covers
the period from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 1999. Exhibit
A-3, prepared by J. Schneider, of the C.C.R.A., contains the
following statement:
Everytime
the employee received his or her wage in cash the employee would
countersign the slip of paper as a form of proof that the wage
was indeed paid. Problems arose as some slips were not
countersigned and as such the employee is claiming those wages
were not paid. The books were reviewed and the employer could not
provide supporting documentation that those wage amounts were
paid and as such those wage amounts were removed from the total
74 amount thereby resulting in a downward adjustment in the T-4
and some employer credits. A detailed journal for A. Rouse was
prepared showing all her wage payments and how the amended T-4s
were calculated.
[8]
Mr. Michael Rowlands, an official of the C.C.R.A., testified at
the hearing. Mr. Rowlands stated that he had prepared the PD
Examination for 1999 (Exhibit A-4). Mr. Rowlands testified that
he had reviewed all of the receipts signed by the Appellant and
prepared detailed calculations. Mr. Rowlands said that
according to his calculations the Appellant received total income
of $5,104.43 from Lynn in 1999.
B.
ISSUE
[9]
Has the Minister correctly calculated the income received by the
Appellant from Lynn in the 1998 and 1999 taxation
years?
C.
ANALYSIS
[10] During the
hearing the Appellant was unable to point to any particular
number or record or document to establish that officials of the
C.C.R.A. were incorrect in their calculation of her income for
the 1998 and 1999 taxation years. I am satisfied that the
Minister is correct in his determination that the Appellant
received the following income:
1998
1999
Income
$5,661.90
$5,104.43
[11] The
appeals are dismissed.
Signed at
Vancouver, British Columbia, this 6th day of September
2002.
J.T.C.C.
COURT FILE
NO.:
2002-773(IT)I
STYLE OF
CAUSE:
Alexandra June Rouse and
Her Majesy the Queen
PLACE OF
HEARING:
Vancouver, British Columbia
DATE OF
HEARING:
August 6, 2002
REASONS FOR
JUDGMENT BY: The Honourable Judge L.M.
Little
DATE OF
JUDGMENT:
September 6, 2002
APPEARANCES:
For the
Appellant:
The Appellant herself
Counsel for
the
Respondent:
Michael Taylor
COUNSEL OF
RECORD:
For the
Appellant:
Name:
Firm:
For the
Respondent:
Morris Rosenberg
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Canada
2002-773(IT)I
BETWEEN:
ALEXANDRA
JUNE ROUSE,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY
THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Appeals
heard on August 6, 2002 at Vancouver, British Columbia,
by
the
Honourable Judge L.M. Little
Appearances
For the
Appellant:
The Appellant herself
Counsel for
the
Respondent:
Michael Taylor
Judgment
The appeals from the assessments
made under the Income Tax Act for the 1998 and
1999 taxation years are dismissed in accordance with the
attached Reasons for Judgment.
Signed at
Vancouver, British Columbia, this 6th day of September
2002.
J.T.C.C.