Date: 19981001
Docket: 98-347-IT-I
BETWEEN:
MERRILL M. GORDON,
Appellant,
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
Respondent.
Reasons for Judgment
McArthur, J.T.C.C.
[1] This appeal is from assessments by the Minister of
National Revenue (the "Minister") wherein the Minister
added to the Appellant's income $2,086.60 and $760.50 in 1995
and 1996 respectively. These amounts were the value attached to a
complimentary parks pass given to the Appellant by the City of
Burnaby, British Columbia.
[2] Upon the conclusion of the trial, I indicated that I
agreed with the Respondent's position that the Appellant was
an employee. After further thought, I have changed that opinion
and find in favour of the Appellant for the reasons that
follow.
[3] For a one year period in the early 1970's, the
Appellant served as an alderman for the City of Burnaby, for
which he was remunerated. After that time, he held many volunteer
positions and to his credit has provided his talents, without
compensation in several worthwhile endeavours towards the benefit
of the City of Burnaby. As a direct result of his having been an
alderman, the City of Burnaby has given him a complimentary pass
that has permitted him, with a guest, to play golf on three of
Burnaby's golf courses.
[3] The Respondent has reduced the assessed amounts to $495 in
1995 and $682 in 1996.
[4] The Appellant is a 69 year old pensioner with limited
financial resources. As stated, he has served the City of Burnaby
for one year as a paid alderman and without compensation for 40
years as a volunteer that included work such as:
- A library trustee and founding member of the Library
Trustees Association of B.C. - 4 years
- Fundraising Chair, 1973 B.C. Summer Games - 6 months
- Parks Commissioner - 6 years
- Burnaby Advisor Planning Commission - 4years
- Director of New Vista Home for Seniors - 4 years
- Founder and Director of Burnaby Youth Soccer - 2 years
- Founder and Director Cliff Ave. Youth Soccer - 42 years
- Volunteer Chair, Burnaby Arts Centre Capital Campaign
raising $2.3 million for the Shadbolt Arts Centre. Full time
non paid work
- 3 years
- Chair of the Burnaby Mental Health Committee - 5 years
- Founding member Burnaby Mountain Preservation Society which
saw 880 acres of land returned from SFU to Burnaby as park
space
- 5 years.
[5] The Minister considered the value of the golf pass as a
retiring allowance pursuant to paragraph 56(1)(a) of the
Income Tax Act (the "Act") or, in the
alternative, the Minister submits that the Appellant received the
amounts as employment income pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(a)
and subsection 6(3) of the Act.
[6] The Appellant submits that it was not a retirement
allowance and that he was never an employee of the City of
Burnaby.
[7] Subsection 56(1) of the Act reads in part as
follows:
"Amounts to be included in income for year –
Without restricting the generality of section 3, there shall be
included in computing the income of a taxpayer for a taxation
year,
(a) pension benefits, unemployment insurance
benefits, etc. – any amount received by the taxpayer in
the year as, on account or in lieu of payment of, or in
satisfaction of,
...
(ii) a retiring allowance, other than an amount received out
of or under an employee benefit plan, a retirement compensation
arrangement or a salary deferral arrangement,
..."
[8] It was the Appellant's uncontradicted evidence that he
received the recreational pass because he served as alderman
about 25 years prior to the relevant taxation years.
[9] The Respondent's primary submission was that the
Appellant received a retiring allowance pursuant to paragraph
56(1)(a).
[10] "Retiring allowance" is defined in subsection
248(1) of the Act as an amount received on or after retirement of
a taxpayer from an office or employment in recognition of the
taxpayer's long service.
[11] "Employment" is defined as the position of an
individual in the service of some other person (including Her
Majesty or a foreign state or sovereign) and "servant"
or "employee" means a person holding such a
position.
[12] "Office" is defined in section 248 as a
position of an individual entitling the individual to a fixed or
ascertainable stipend or remuneration and includes a judicial
office, the office of a minister of the Crown, the office of a
member of the Senate or House of Commons of Canada, a member of a
legislative assembly or a member of a legislative or executive
council and any other office, the incumbent of which is elected
by popular vote or is elected or appointed in a representative
capacity and also includes the position of a corporation
director, and "officer" means a person holding such an
office.
[13] In order for the benefit amount to be considered a
"retiring allowance", the Appellant must have received
it in the year in lieu of payment of or in satisfaction of a
retiring allowance. The Appellant received the benefit amount for
having served as an alderman in about 1970. This is not an amount
"after retirement of a taxpayer from an office or employment
in recognition of the taxpayer's long service"; he
served as alderman for one year. He was an elected member of City
Council, an independent representative of the people and not an
employee.
[14] I find that the Appellant's volunteer services do not
meet the definitions of "office or employment". He was
not a servant or employee. He generously donated his time to
benefit his community. There was no evidence that he was an
individual holding a position in the service of some other
person. To find differently would lead to a conclusion that
surely was not intended in the meaning of subsection 56(1).
Applying the tests found in Wiebe Door Services Ltd. v.
M.N.R. [1986] 3 C.F. 553, I have no difficulty in concluding
that the Appellant was not an employee.
[15] Having found that the Appellant was not an employee of
the City of Burnaby during 1995 and 1996, he did not receive the
amounts as employment income pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(a)
and subsection 6(3) of the Act. Therefore, the appeal is
allowed.
Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 1st day of October 1998.
"C.H. McArthur"
J.T.C.C.